| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
johnlear
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| chaiyah wrote: | Issues, eh?
What I do is library objections to lies and fraud.
What I also do is restore photos to natural color.
Those are my behaviors: ethical and careful.
Is that not enough to be treated with simple respect and be allowed to make my own judgments?
In most places, No. I get trashed everywhere.
Em |
I am neither licensed nor qualified to provide you with psychological therapy.
But I can make a comment in my role as first responder:
STOP BANGING YOUR HEAD ON THE WALL. ITS NOT GOING TO HELP!!!!
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
chaiyah
Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 182
Location: cyberspace
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Seven thousand hits a day ain't nothin'.
Somebody has to take out the garbage.
Here, some nice music. Relax.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjgTD66BsCM
: ) Em
_________________
( >#( >7( >~Chai |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Lux
Joined: 03 Jun 2008
Posts: 44
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnlear wrote: |
This issue has come up many times over the past few years and the issue is, "Why can some peole easily see the structures and some not."
Zorgon and I have studied this issue and it does not seem to have anything to do with intelligence.
But, there is some reason that the "Universal Power Dude" has prevented some people from easily seeing these structures.
The structures that are clearest seem to get a "WOW" from some people and, "huh?" from others.
|
That's an interesting topic. I also think it goes the other way. That is,
some people see more than is there.
For example, I think Hoagland does that. I do respect many of his
observations and discoveries but I think he jumps to conclusions at times
too and concludes that more is there than is apparent. It's not that he
doesn't find anomalies -- he does. It's just that he connects more dots
than are there and carries his conclusions a little too far. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
johnlear
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a Lunar Orbiter photo of a city on the moon:
Please do not ask me where the city is. If you don't see then you are not supposed to see it.
Actually the photo is spectacular in its 62 mb version but this is the best I can do here. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
chaiyah
Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 182
Location: cyberspace
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This photo is a composite of 7 or 8 pieces taken at an oblique angle.
There's NO WAY to see anything, I don't care, what you do to it.
Not only that, but the resolution is lousy, 72 ppi.
My grandmother's Kodak box camera could have done better than that.
There is absolutely no FUNCTIONAL intention on the part of NASA to show us what is real and true. That is my considered judgment after re-processing about three hundred of their photos.
They're in the business of fooling everybody so that their REAL and ACTUAL intentions cannot be inferred from the data they display; and there is a huge discontinuity between their data and their published statements.
Well, you can fool some of the people all the time and all the people some of the time; but you can't fool all the people all the time. MARS IS ALREADY INHABITED and the moon is populated also.
http://www.abidemiracles.com/images/nasamars/columbiapan2MEC.jpg
Emily
_________________
( >#( >7( >~Chai |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
johnlear
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chaiyah wrote: | This photo is a composite of 7 or 8 pieces taken at an oblique angle.
There's NO WAY to see anything, I don't care, what you do to it.
Not only that, but the resolution is lousy, 72 ppi.
My grandmother's Kodak box camera could have done better than that. |
Here is the original Lunar Orbiter photo. There was no compositing. I put a rectangle where the city is.
The original photo is about 370 mb. It will be up on thelvingmoon.com in a few days.
The only reason I put it at 75 ppi is its easier to work with in imageshack.
Your grandmother must have had a lunar orbiting Kodak box camera. 
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
chaiyah
Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 182
Location: cyberspace
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay. Luner Orbiter. The yellow box is a pain in the tush trying to figure out the coloration; but here goes. Dunno if this'll work. I see streets, trees and what could be roofs and a parallel grid. Lousy resolution, though; I don't care if it IS a 75 mb file. Here's what I get, colored.
Can you send me a copy of this [boxed] segment of the original, John, and I'll try again, to get a better focus. ~*~ Emily
_________________
( >#( >7( >~Chai |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
johnlear
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Send your email to johnlear@cox.net and I will send you a 100mb version of the city just to stop you from whining. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
chaiyah
Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 182
Location: cyberspace
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow John! I'm inFAMOUS for my whining! A true discontent.
I believe we have reason to be scared, and it's not being discussed.
Send your chunk to chaiyah@gmail.com and/or emicra8@aol.com
One address or the other ought to be able to handle it.
This'll be fun. Thanks!
Em
_________________
( >#( >7( >~Chai |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
chaiyah
Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 182
Location: cyberspace
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's a 76 mb tif file downloading now.
I'm going to have to do a couple of conversions to be able to color it : first to .png and then to .jpg. This will reduce its size somewhat.
I'm excited about the possibility of really improving the articulation of this data. As soon as I make sense of it, John, I'll send it back to you.
Or, I can put it up here in pieces, whatever you want.
Em
_________________
( >#( >7( >~Chai |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
