 |
|
 |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
johnlear
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lubomir wrote: | Greetings, Mr. Lear!
I'm familiar with your work since the last year. I'm from Bulgaria, EU. I'm nearly 19 years old, and just have graduated from high school. My interest in this whole matter goes several years back when I've watched Star Wars and Star Trek movies. They left an Impression on me, and I begun to ask myself how can we build such starships. It was an obsession to me and still is  So I have started to keep an eye on NASA, but from there comes my first big disappointment - BPP Project. Then I got deep into the conspiracies to search for an answer. I've landed on one Bulgarian web site http://www.xnetbg.com/
and through it to several foreign like abovetopsecret, Dark government, The Disclosure project.... and everywhere was mentioned the antigravity technology and generators of free energy (ZPE). The administrators of xnetbg have done a lot of work by translating tremendous amound of data about all kinds of conspiracies, including the truth behind hiding the antigravity. And there was this guy who claimed that he has done a lot of study on this subject.
http://www.teosfera.piczo.com/?cr=3
He showed some experiments done in his home. I began to believe him after I watched some NASA UFO proofs. STS-75, STS-80, STS-115 and STS-117.... and others. The technology exist, I started to observe Gravity Control Technologies (GCT) and Archer Enterprises
http://www.stardrivedevice.com/
The first one disappointmented me, and now is only Mark Tomion left. Is he going to be Zefram Cochrane of tomorrow? I hope so. But I don't think that we are going far with this speed. I mean just look all the space agencies. Why don’t they begin publicly to develope antigravity and other stuff? Why fooling people with rockets? If they were real far-sighted scientist, they would have known that projects like BPP are more important than ISS! Such projects deserve more attention than anything else at the moment. If Michael Griffin was far-sighted administrator, he would have at least supported the recovery of Marc Millis’s work. What are 2 milion $ to NASA? - nothing. And I can say the same for Roskosmos, ESA, JAXA and others. At least the Biefeld-Brown effect can be improved by them. It is antigravity, but they said it is “pseudo- science” and “magic”...
If using today’s rockets, even 500 years won’t be enough to
colonize the Sol, that's for sure.
So.... how long until antigravity will be released and will replace airplanes and rockets? |
Hello Lubomir,
Anti-gravity was developed between 1952 and 1956. My fathers company " Lear, Inc." was one of the original contractors. After 56 years of development I am sure we have some pretty fancy things flying out there.
The Mercury, Gemini and Apollo space programs were just a cover to make people think we didn't have the technology we really had. And the Apollo moon missions were faked. They never happened. The Space Shuttle is a similar cover program.
We have about 12 orbiting weapons platforms that are used for various millitary purpose of which one was to drop of World Trade Center.
My question now is Apollo certainly didn't go to the moon, did we go there with some other technology. Or was the Van Allen Belt impossible for man to get through?
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Lubomir
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 21
Location: Bulgaria, EU
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnlear wrote: |
Hello Lubomir,
Anti-gravity was developed between 1952 and 1956. My fathers company " Lear, Inc." was one of the original contractors. After 56 years of development I am sure we have some pretty fancy things flying out there. |
Developed in US and Soviet Union at the same time, yes, but from other sources I hear it was decades earlier - since Tesla times. Look some of the materials of Vladimir Terziski. He wrote some books on the case. And from his point of view such highly advanced project and their bases are in locations where no man goes like bases within mountains, big wood forests in Canada, Amazon Rainforest, Latin America, Siberia.... and Area 51 as well
The Mexican military caught something on camera in 2004.
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/408...xican_air_force_pilots_film_11_u/
Are these man made or extraterrestrials?
| johnlear wrote: | | The Mercury, Gemini and Apollo space programs were just a cover to make people think we didn't have the technology we really had. And the Apollo moon missions were faked. They never happened. The Space Shuttle is a similar cover program. |
That means that in 2018-2020 the rockets Ares 1 and 5 won't go outside Earth's field, but only to ISS? Then how are they going to lie the people? Or this time the lie will be a bigger one when others jump into it - when China and Russia launch their own rockets, which, according to them, will also go to the Moon and people will believe  However I think that by then something would go outside the box, I hope.
Finding the fifth and sixth fundamental force must happen soon. Boyd Bushman said that LCH will play an important role in discovering antigravity You, Sir, think that too?
| johnlear wrote: | | We have about 12 orbiting weapons platforms that are used for various millitary purpose of which one was to drop of World Trade Center. |
Look this video
http://www.xnetbg.com/new/content/view/79/1/#Preloader
It shows what happened to The Pentagon - a rocket hit it. But shows not the World Trade Center
Is this one of the platforms
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JophfMG65cc&feature=related
part of Star Wars program
| johnlear wrote: | | My question now is Apollo certainly didn't go to the moon, did we go there with some other technology. Or was the Van Allen Belt impossible for man to get through? |
Antigravity shields the disc-shaped crafts from meteors and radiation. That means that people did go to the moon, but with 'other' tech. I'm convinced they go to Mars and other places as well.
Will NASA ever reform, or the agency will continue to hoax with rockets more decades? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
drmicrochip
Joined: 06 Jan 2009
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:25 pm Post subject: Re: Question for John |
|
|
| Sarentack wrote: | | Do you know Alex Collier? Have you seen his interview from 1994 where apparently he was an abductee, if so, do you believe any of what he has said? |
Hi Sarentack,
I know who Alex Collier is as well and have watched that video. Pretty interesting stuff. Not sure if it's true or not. I do know, according to Michael Salla, that Collier was silenced and went underground due to Naval intelligence threatening him. Not many people have spoken out about the Alpha Draconans except for David Ike.
_________________
"Think for yourself. Think with an open mind. Do your own research." |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
