| Archive for johnlearsmoon.myfastforum.org a forum for parties interested in john lears upcoming book the living moon and the conspiracies surrounding a populated solar system |
| undo |
The Star*Gates Are Real Threadassociated links:The ATS Forum post (warning, 30 plus pages of discussion) http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread197741/pg1 The Star*Gates website http://thestargates.com My Sumerian Blogspot http://sumerian.blogspot.com My in progress e-book has only 2 pages available publically: http://www.thestargates.com/book/page1.html two free e-books, rather short but documented, at: The Anunnaki and the Abyss http://www.artapprentice.net/sumer/anunnakiabyss/cover.html Nibiru and Wormwood http://www.artapprentice.net/sumer/nibiruwormwood/cover.html Sumerian Edin or Eden? http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread229458/pg1 Introductory Notes: I'm currently arguing with myself over the concepts advanced by other researchers, that there was an entire civilization on the ocean floor and/or below ground. The possiblity does exist that either of these was or is possible. The problems we are facing with that, however, are the inferences that link the below ground/water star gates to the stars and not a civilization under ground. i suppose they could've had outposts on the ocean floor or under the surface of the earth, as well. There are several possibilities of why that might be true: 1) An extra-terrestrial colony might need protection from our sun, especially if they are from a planet/moon where the amounts and types of radiation are limited or have long since been filtered. Alternatively, they may have been water-based and naturally built under water. 2) Considering the catastrophic history of this planet, it's possible extra-terrestral or simply entirely different sentient life, was here in the past (before homo sapians) and that they built underground and ocean floor, to escape things like ruined ozone layer, incoming space debris (meteors, etc), nuclear winter and so on. That however, doesn't effect whether or not the star gates existed, as I think if they were advanced (and i do believe they were) extra-terrestrials, they would either know how to find "worm holes" in the area, or they would create them for ease of transfer of other sentients, goods, and etc I think you will find that the artworks of Sumer are not the same as the artworks of Akkadia or Babylon. There was a massive flood in the area, and the survivors reshaped the prior civilization. The ancestors of these survivors, such as Nimrod (Akkadian Enmerkar, Egyptian Osiris) humanized the prior "gods" (my theory), such as Enki (or Ea or Enki-Ea), who I believe is the being you can see here: http://oi.uchicago.edu/OI/IRAQ/dbfiles/objects/11.htm , as opposed to more humanized depictions of him in Akkadia and Babylon, with big slanting eyes. This may have been an attempt to change the view of the gods to reflect the nephilim offspring as gods. According to the ancient Sumerian texts, Enki's E.ABZU (his supposed "ziggurat"), had walls that gave advice. This conjures in the mind, scenes of hieroglyphic writing etched in the metallic surface of his "ziggurat" (and yes, it was entirely composed of metals). The question here is, was it actual writing the ancient sumerians saw etched in the metal OR was there some type of communication device embedded in the walls or one of the walls, which allowed the occupants within to exchange information (give advice) with the people outside the edifice? And when these particular edifices were gone, did the surviving humans try to depict this event by writing advice on the walls of their edifices in the form of hieroglyphs? Is it possible an audible or television type communication device/viewing screen was the inspiration for writing on walls OR was there some type of writing on the metal walls of the E.ABZU, that inspired the Akkadians, Egyptians and Babylonians to follow suit? Why are the only artifacts currently available for viewing from ancient Sumer (specifically from ancient Eridu and Ur) that depict beings, reptilian in appearance, with slitted eyes, spindly legs and arms, and fingers that number 6 on each hand? The only other figurines from that time frame are obese females with huge thighs and breasts and no heads (so there's no way to determine if it is indeed human) and no lower legs/feet (legs are missing below the kneecap on all such figurines). For some reason, they remind a bit of a big thanksgiving turkey. The rest of the excavated art works are vases, plates, bowls and small, odd symbols. No complete figurines of the timeframe depict humans, only the reptilian looking beings holding either what appear to be symbols of power or in another case, a breast-feeding infant sporting clawed, webbed hands, slitted eyes and an oddly shaped head. (see my avatar for the one holding the symbol of power, some type of staff, possibly the "Me", the powers of destiny/fate etc. ). There are no depictions of human kings. No depictions of medicine men or people of power -- EXCEPT the reptilian looking figures. Copied here from the ATS forum posting on the subject of star gates, by E. Vegh (Ancient) Stargates are real: either that or there's several ancient civilizations inside the earth or stuffed in some canyon on the sea floor. Personally, my research leads me to believe the former: et.al, stargates are real. Sounds crazy? Yes, it honestly does, but so does quantum cloning and teleportation, and yet it's happening as we speak. Science is the equivalent of the Twilight Zone, Star Wars and Star Trek, all rolled into one, these days. If you'd like to inquire as to what I've learned, feel free to ask. If you'd like to debate the possibilities, be my guest. If you'd just like to say I'm wrong, also, do as you will. I don't wish to just dump all this information in your laps so let's just start with the basic premise: (Ancient) Stargates are real. Ancient history is a good place to start. Have you noticed how about 300 years ago or thereabouts, all our ancient history texts were basically ruled unreliable because they mentioned "supernatural" events? All religious texts, (many of which were historical texts that were simply labelled "religious"), except the hieroglyphs from ancient Egypt, were said to be falsehoods. Using the hieroglyphs, they attempted to set a timeline for ancient history, but ignored everything else. That was a big mistake. Nearly every ancient civilization refers to a place called the "underworld" and a place called the heavens, both of which appear to be more than simply metaphors for the planets and stars rising and setting into and over the horizon. The ancient Hindus and some of the Buddhists, said the only way to access the upper levels of heaven was via Mt. Meru (also called Mt. Sumeru), which wasn't an actual mountain but a reference to a ziggurat in ancient Sumer (this is the pivotal point, but I don't want to overload your circuits with too much information if you aren't aware of any of these ancient stories). The ancient egyptians also believed in an entrance to the underworld and a boat which travelled on heavenly waters (et.al, a mode of transportation) which carried them into the heavens. The ancient sumerians referred to otherworldly places which were accessed via gateways into the underworld, and gates up to the heavens. I guess it all depends on how much you know about ancient civilizations and their texts. Sumer is modern day Iraq. It was the first civilization, to date. Not the first people, but the first known civilization. The stories about ancient Sumer are written down in their cuneiform cylinder seals, which were really the equivalent of timeless history books. Other stories were found in the Hindu Mahabarata and the Hebrew Torah and Pseudopigraphia (the Book of Enoch, the Book of Giants, etc). Also, even some of the oldest stories (or histories) from ancient China have echoes of the events that happened back in Sumer and even describe some of the exploits of the biblical Nimrod (also known as the Egyptian Osiris, Akkadian Enmerkar, and Babylonian Gilgamesh). Enki (or Ea, or Enki-Ea, all the same guy) . He supposedly built a ziggurat in ancient Sumer but the description of it is FAR from being a ziggurat. It's said to have been composed entirely of silver (not mud bricks covered in silver but entirely of silver). It's interior was a "tangled thread beyond understanding", the walls speak and give advice, it floats and hovers, and shines so brightly it lights up the area. Oh and it also "roars." I'm not making this up. It's in their ancient texts (see "Enki and the World Order"). This is not the description of a ziggurat. But if you were to see a depiction of Enki's ziggurat, it would be maybe four floors high, each floor a bit smaller than the one below it, with a glowing "Temple" on top, and have the appearance of a throne (such as the Emperor's throne in the Emperor's Palace, Forbidden City, China) or the typical UFO model (the saucer, but in this case, with squared corners and a lighted, glowing dome on top). When Enki's "ziggurat" first came here, it emerged from the abyss, the underworld called the Abzu or Apsu, and landed in what was to become Sumer. He and his compadres then set about building ancient Sumer. This event is detailed briefly in Genesis 6:4 of the bible, the Book of Enoch and in Enki and the World Order. What has so many confused is how it could come up from down. The answer is that the down it came from was a stargate. Enki and Enlil were brother Anunnaki. I interpret them to be the equivalent of the Hindu gods mentioned in the Mahabarata, the old gods of the Egyptians (meaning those that predate Osiris, the Falcon gods) and the Angels of the biblical texts, albeit the fallen ones. Are you familar with the Abydos "Osirieon" of ancient Egypt? If not, check it out here: http://www.phouka.com/pharaoh/egypt/photos/abydos/osireon-01.html . It belongs to a group of buildings I think of as the Anunnaki buildings. The reason I believe this will become apparent when you read the information on it. It's undecorated like the Great Pyramid of Cheops or Khufu. It definitely predates the Temple of Seti and it's built underground for a reason that relates directly to what I've already said in this thread. I personally think there were more stargates. For example, Tiwanaku (Tiahuanacu, by Lake Titicaca, Peru), not only hosts the Gateway of the Sun, but another "Anunnaki" subterranean building called "The Subterranean Temple", which you can see here (first picture on the top left): http://www.archaeology.org/interactive/tiwanaku/ The walls of the temple feature the faces of various "races" of humans, it's megalithic, very old. I think it housed a stargate at one point. All of these "subterranean chambers" are not only related to Enki's Abzu stargate but to the "bottomless pit" in the book of Revelation in the bible. ( Revelation 9 ) which is derived from the word "Abyss", which is derived from the word Abzu or Apsu. Read Revelation 9 http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B66C009.htm the biblical account seems to indicate they were all buried under several feet of silt and rock, not to be rediscovered until the end times of planet earth. Enki's gate is still buried (at least until recently). Something many people are not aware of: Enki's E.ABZU ziggurat was situated on the same exact spot as the later Tower of Babel, which is called the Etemenanki. You can read about the Etemenanki here: http://www.livius.org/es-ez/etemenanki/etemenanki.html It was built on the same spot as Enki's "ziggurat", which means it is the location of the bottomless pit of Revelation 9, as well. It dawned on me that the biblical bottomless pit and Abzu of Enki were related somehow. It still hadn't dawned on me, at that point, that it was a stargate. In fact, some people believe all these ancient references to the "underworld" were actually referring to a civilization inside the planet. I don't think so. The text actually says: An artfully made bright crenellation rising out from the abzu was erected for lord Nudimmud. Enki, the lord who determines the fates, built up his temple entirely from silver and lapis lazuli. Its silver and lapis lazuli were the shining daylight. [...] Its brickwork makes utterances and gives advice. [...] He built the temple from precious metal, decorated it with lapis lazuli, and covered it abundantly with gold. [...] As it has been built, as it has been built; as Enki has raised Eridug up, it is an artfully built mountain which floats on the water. (Source is The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature, University of Oxford, Oriental Institute.) http://www-etcsl.orient.ox.ac.uk/section1/tr114.htm Actually, none of the ancient civs were rip-offs. The ancient texts of the various races are ancestoral memories and oral histories of the past. Contrary to mainstream archaeology and historians, I believe the ancient texts were not religious in the same way as we view the word today. I believe they were first hand, historical accounts. In one such account, Enki's ziggurat is said to have an upper emplacement in the constellation "The Field," which translates to "somewhere in the Pegasus constellation." I kid you not.. "The shrine's emplacement is situated by the constellation the Field, the holy upper shrine's emplacement faces towards the Chariot constellation." To translate that into english, consider that the second half of the sentence is a further clarification of the first half of the sentence and not two different places being referred to. The "shrine" is Enki's ziggurat which was sitting on top of a subterranean chamber called the Abzu. This quote is from "Enki and the World Order", an ancient sumerian text, translated by Oriental Institute, University of Oxford and listed on the Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-...l.cgi?text=t.1.1.3&charenc=j# According to archaeological digs in the area of where Sumer sprang up, semites already were present in the area before the cities of Sumer were built. This essentially means, the hebrews were there as well, and have their own accounts of what they saw, some of which are oral histories as indicated in a few passages in Deutoronomy, where Moses is recounting the oral histories to the people. These oral histories speak of the Tower of Babel and the subsequent governments/nations that followed, information that isn' t in the bible but simply referred to as support for further information he was about to regale them with. The more indepth information was stuff that never made it into the bible because the bible was a condensed version of thousands of years of history and genealogies. Let's consider the Akkadian mainstream version of the flood and compare it to the biblical and Book of Enoch version. In the mainstream version Enlil has a hissy fit, claims the people are too noisy, and decides to have a flood kill them all. In the biblical and pseudopigraphical version, the fallen ones had infected the populace, made hybrids (nephilim) that appeared to like human flesh for dinner. They had nearly wiped out the entire human population on the planet, thusly why it says Noah was perfect in his generations (he was fully human). The Akkadian version attributes the flood and the warning to Enlil and Enki. However, the biblical texts indicate that Noah was warned by Jehovah because he was one of the only humans left in all of mesopotamia. (note: what that amounts to is, the anunnaki offspring were human hybrids. if you've heard that saying " Never meddle in the affairs of dragons for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup," then you have some idea of what I'm saying. they ate humans. the planet was completely polluted. crops wouldn't grow, there was some kind of nuclear exchange, which can be read in the hindu mahabarata which devastated whole cities. we began to look tasty with ketchup, hold the pickles hold the lettuce. this is why there was a flood, not because we were too noisy. btw, nibru is enlil's city of nippur. the etymology for it is pretty convincing: nibru became nibbur became nippur. nibiru the planet, doesn't exist, although the tenth planet may exist, it isn't called nibru. the heaven-earth bond, called the DUR.ANKI, was a stargate at nibru (nippur) and not solely a communications center (Sitchin theorized that the Dur.Anki was like a Cape Kennedy or Houston Space Center. I disagree). This is the Abzu entrance. Notice the water flowing around the door, with stairs leading upwards inside the door. http://freepages.history.rootsweb.com/~catshaman/0tree-filer/abzu.JPG It's pertinent to note the image above is from a sumerian cylinder seal. After the flood (which I theorize was caused by pollution which caused the polar icecaps to melt. ironic, isn't it?) one of Noah's descendants, named Nimrod/Enmerkar/Osiris/Gilgamesh was the first "babylonian" world emperor. He attributed to himself, all the deeds of the Anunnaki before him. He refers to Enki as his father (in other words, he was a hybrid), even though he was raised by one of Noah's descendants. He became a mighty man before the Lord. Mighty in this case, is attributed almost exclusively in biblical texts, to the nephilim hybrids. Anyway, he carts off all his knowledge about the past to Egypt, which he reconfigures ever so slightly to make him the new god Emperor. So yep, there are definitely references to star gates in the ancient Egypt paintings. They just appear in heavy metaphorical terms, primarily because alot of what they were depicting, after several generations had passed, was based on Nimrod's semi-truths of ancient truths, which were themselves not entirely reliable. Anyway, I think they used the star gates to travel between the sites here on earth where they had enslaved the local populaces, such as in Peru at Lake Titicaca. I'm still trying to track down what exactly the Osirieon in Abydos is actually about, but my working theory is that it either contained a star gate or was a model of the original chamber at Enki's ziggurat (in Eridu) that contained the star gate. The trail has thus far, lead me to Heliopolis, which unfortunately is mostly covered up by modern day Cairo, and to the burial crypt of Seti I, in the Valley of the Kings, Egypt. Also, consider that Enki's ziggurat was in reality a spaceship, which was the model for all subsequent ziggurats, pyramids and obelisks or ben-bens. See an example here: http://www.thestargates.com/book/eabzu.jpg Does that not look like a saucer ufo and a throne? No wonder it's referred to as the throne of the Abzu in one the various stories regarding Enlil and Enki. I don't remember which one now, but I will look it up. It completes the circle and makes alot more sense of the ziggurats and pyramids. The thing was solid, silvery metallic inside with blue designs and gold metallic color on the outside. Its remains can't be found because it LEFT! However, the star gate is not the pyramid or the ziggurat, it's a device UNDER the pyramid or ziggurat. Enlil had his own Abzu, apparently: "Enlil , holy Urac is favored with beauty for you; you are greatly suited for the Abzu, the holy throne ; you refresh yourself in the deep underworld, the holy chamber. Your presence spreads awesomeness over the E-kur, the shining temple, the lofty dwelling." From "Enlil in the E.KUR" http://www.earth-history.com/Sumer/sumer-enlil-ekur.htm And Enki's ziggurat, the E.ABZU, was antediluvian which was gone after the flood according to the biblical and sumerian texts. It was replaced by the Etemenanki (Tower of Babel, which was not a tower but a ziggurat). The Etemenanki has been torn down and rebuilt several times. Read this, if you're interested in the subject: http://www.livius.org/es-ez/etemenanki/etemenanki.html My personal opinion is that the technology for the star gates was already here before the rise of human civilizations. As I mentioned earlier, I believe what we call "angels" and "extra-terrestrials", lived on this planet at one point, prior to humans. I believe this is indicated in the bible and in some of the sumerian writings. There may have been several races of angels, which would go a long way in explaining why people who claim they've encountered extra-terrestrials, have so many different descriptions for them. I'm unsure how advanced their civilization on earth was, but it must've been pretty far along. This does not contradict the bible, because angels are said to be created beings. They inhabit bodies. They can eat, drink, speak, fight, have sex, the whole gamut of activities, that we humans take part in, and then some. However, there appears to have been a separation, according to biblical texts, of powers. The "angels" were given free wills, just as humans have, and, just like humans, some of them made wrong or bad choices. This is being reinacted on our planet as we speak. We think of them as the holy angels and the fallen angels. The fallen ones, otherwise known as the Anunnaki, interfered (think of it like disobeying the prime directive) with the human race. They taught us war and weapons of war, when we didn't even know how to count to 2, for example. That wasn't a very good idea, I might add. They polluted the planet with their subsequent wars, using humans as cannon fodder. They tinkered with us genetically, polluting the genomes of nearly every living thing on the planet. (sounds familar). These are not good "angels" or "aliens", for that matter. I approached it from the premise that the ancient tech was ante-diluvian. Only some antediluvian buildings survived the flood, the rest were wiped out. The technology was inherent to the Anunnaki buildings/spacecraft and remained within them or buried under the ground. Instead the humans were taught how to make the tools necessary to feed, clothe, battle, and mine resources. I think they treated our planet like a playground, a mining facility and a lab, where they could do whatever they wanted because we were intent on rebelling against God and lost the capacity to engage His assistance on our behalf. In other words, we no longer believed in the "unseen God," but rather the ones standing in front of us, the Anunnaki gods, who were visible and mighty and impressive! And their rules were great - do the physical labor we require and we'll keep you entertained and teach you how to do all manner of interesting things! We won't ask you to control your physical urges, to keep the flesh in subjection to the spirit. Instead, we'll encourage you to party till you drop...dead (plenty more slaves where you came from). All those stories about fairies, ogres, giants, sphinx, unicorns, and various animorphs, and human hybrids, may actually be hybrids they created from the existing flora and fauna of the planet. Which is one of the reasons why the planet was so polluted, both genetically and environmentally, before the flood. It says in the old testament of the bible that the giants were wiped out from the earth, in such a way that there would no longer be any trace left of them for people to remember them by. Apparently, the text is trying to impress the idea that God didn't want people worshipping the bones of the ancients or trying to resurrect them in some scenario like the Jurassic Park theme. By the way, as a little side note: The original author of the screenplay for the movie, Stargate, was an egyptologist. He sent the screenplay to Devlin, and Devlin turned it down. Then, a few years later, Devlin decided he liked the idea after all, changed a few things, and made it into a movie. This is not a big surprise. The egyptologist took it to court and the case was settled out of court. On Wikipedia Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin were sued by an Egyptology student for allegedly stealing the storyline as the student had submitted the story to them about ten years before the movie was made (they "rejected" the story at the time). The plaintiff had a respected Egyptologist from Johns Hopkins University vouch for him, since he had put his own theories into the story. The only differences between the story and the movie are slight name variations. The issue was finally settled out of court. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stargate_(film) Have you ever wondered why the ancient people seemed to place so much emphasis on first borns? Did you know it was the tradition of the nephilim kings, to impregnate the brides of their kingdoms on the night before their weddings? This was not only a tradition in Mesopotamia, but even in Egypt (the Angel of Death killed only first borns of Egypt) and in Britain and other European kingdoms. That meant the first borns were nephilim offspring (2nd borns I guess you could say), from which the kings could choose a suitable replacement or give jobs of importance within the hierarchy. Your importance and value, was measured by how much Anunnaki blood you had flowing in your veins. The biblical tradition was quite different. It didn't matter when you were born, only that you served God in spirit and in law (not in servitude, such as slavery to the Anunnaki!). According to Revelation 9, when the bottomless pit is dug up and "unlocked", that's when the trouble begins. Several ideas come to mind regarding why this may have already happened: 1. In the ancient texts, specificially the bible and Book of Enoch (a pseudopigraphical text), it explains that the earth was a mess the last time the Anunnaki/Angels/Aliens were involved with our governments on a major scale. Have you read these accounts? You really should. Consider the people who wrote down what they saw, were doing their best to describe the events. But the German High Critics, some 300 years ago, decided it was all a bunch of hooey. It really wasn't their fault. They were just the skeptics of their day. That was before our geneticists figured out people can be created in other ways than simply via the birth canal. That was before flying machines. That was before laser technology. Solar power. Spaceships. Satellites. And before quantum and theoretical physics. 2. Because of #1, our planet has grown technologically, by leaps and bounds. I mean, incredibly fast! Today, they are publically designing a quantum computer and working on worm hole theory. Everything we see reported in the mainstream, is about 5-10 years behind the actual development, to keep rival companies and rival countries, from gaining access to sensitive technological inventions and innovations. So what we don't know for certain now, we will know for certain in the future (provided we don't use that other ancient device known as the atom bomb and blow each other into oblivion, first). I believe this massive increase in technology was assisted along by outside forces, the same forces that assisted in nearly destroying the earth in antediluvian times. All the same signs are visible: pollution, both genetic and environmental, rapid transit, rapid flying transit, space going vessels, sea going vessels, under and over the water, rampant diseases, massive plagues, (65% of all military members who were in the Gulf War are now on disability or they are dead, mostly from Gulf War Syndrome), depleted uranium is poisoning Iraq and the people in it, once again. The bible describes the last days of planet Earth as being a carbon copy of the days of Noah, which were characterized by rampant wars and pollution, diseases, and the destruction of the greenery of the planet. The animals were so badly mutated genetically and because of disease, they were no longer edible. Green planet life was dying from massive droughts. The offspring of the Anunnaki, started eating humans enmasse. Soylent Green, anyone? 3. An increase in UFO sightings following Hitler's charge for archaeological relics which just happen to almost coincide with our discovery of the nuclear bomb, which was followed by the introduction of space going craft, etc. As far as knowing the schematics of a star gate: nopers, not a clue. As regards your questions about greed, I have no idea if they even have it yet, or if they've found a way to open it. According to Revelation 9, the thing is opened by an Angel/Alien/Anunnaki, who descends to the earth and opens it. Here's a little study I did on Anunnaki traits in ancient Royals: The Akhenaton Family Princess Meritaten, the daughter of King Akhenaten http://www.thestargates.com/image/Meritaten.jpg According to this article at National Geographic, this skull was NOT the result of disease. http://www7.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0506/feature1/gallery4.html King Tutankhamen http://www7.nationalgeographic.co...6/feature1/images/gallery.1.3.jpg Seti I http://www.thestargates.com/image/seti1.jpg Sitamon - daughter of Ahmose http://www.thestargates.com/image/hatshepsut.jpg Djedptahiufankh - son of Ramesses http://www.thestargates.com/image/dzed.jpg Tuthmosis III weaponmasters wow A Statue from ancient Mesopotamia http://oi.uchicago.edu/OI/IRAQ/dbfiles/objects/11.htm Check out the hieroglyphic carving, and notice the skulls of the adults and the children: http://www.rainbowcrystal.com/egypt/E-77akhenaton.jpg I'm sure you've seen the elongated skulls of the inca tribes that were said to bind the heads of their royal babies so the skull would form elongated. The problem is, the ancient egyptians didn't do this head binding and yet their royals were frequently born with elongated heads. I'm assuming some of the elongated skulls are the result of hybridization and genetic abnormalities, and some are the result of mimicry, where it became a fad, but these cannot all be the result of head binding: Here's more elognated skulls: http://www.crystalinks.com/incanskulls.html Lord Pacal from Palenque (Inca), also had an elongated skull: http://www.pacal.de/pacal.htm Why did the ancient egyptian pharaohs wear these kinds of hats? http://www.let.leidenuniv.nl/saqq...es/egyptology/glossary/pharao.jpg http://www.ordination.org/Moses-pharaoh.jpg http://library.thinkquest.org/CR0210200/ancient_egypt/pharaoh.gif Emperors of China, Huang Di: http://www.chinapage.com/emperor/huangdi.html Shaohan-Jintian: http://www.chinapage.com/emperor/wudi0004.html Taizu http://www.chinapage.com/painting/mingtaizu2.html The Hindu Gods/Goddesses: http://www.indiaplaces.com/india-...mages/img/hindu-gods-rama-02.jpeg http://shivason.tripod.com/hindugods.html http://www.maps2anywhere.com/Graphics/India_-_Hindu-Gods.jpg Why not a normal crown? What was the point of having crowns that seemed tailored to accomodate a large, elongated head? Were they genetically different than homosapian skulls? You betcha. THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS DIDN'T HEAD BIND. Archaeologists claim only the Amarna royal family of Egypt had such elongated skulls, but is that actually true? Or are they mimicking or suggesting something else, something they've come to associate with the gods? http://www.comeseeegypt.com/galleries/pharaohs.htm http://www.livius.org/a/1/egypt/narmer.jpg http://www.livius.org/a/1/egypt/ramses_iii.jpg Skull of Akhenaten? (controversial as to which egyptian royal it belongs to): http://anubis4_2000.tripod.com/mummypics1/Akhenaten.jpg Sumerian Anu: http://erikparker.com/articles/art_pics/anu1.jpg The doctors are saying the egyptian skulls are not showing signs of head binding or of disease, and it's not a case of genetic abnormalities due to inbreeding. Inbreeding in humans causes microencephaly (small skulls) but not elongated skulls. I think the nephilim offspring are the only remaining evidences of the nephilim themselves, but proof of the Anunnaki can only be seen (as far as I know)_in the biblical, sumerian, hindu, chinese, egyptian, pseudopigraphical and other mesopotamian texts and in their artworks. Even some of the ancient Greek, Roman and classical tales from Europe and the British Isles have echoes of it. That is, unless of course, you meet one in person. People are still encountering angels/aliens. Some good. Some not. I theorize that we have been so indoctrinated by tv, movies, books and magazines that such images don't seem to be out of the ordinary. BUT THEY ARE. The more wide spread the genetic phenomenon amongst royal families, the more you should be asking: Is this all the result of inbreeding, head binding, normal genetic abnormailities, or is there more to it? I believe there is more to it. Read the Epic of Gilgamesh. The guy was banging every human bride in his kingdom on the eves of their weddings to their human husbands. So the first child was almost always a hybrid. Then the king had a talent pool to choose from, from amongst his own various offspring with any number of human women. I've always wondered why Herod, Jehovah and etc, killed first borns, specifically. Think about it. It's all a build up to the biblical end time scenario. Have you read Revelation ? Alot of this could've been avoided had we paid a bit more attention to the ancient texts of our ancestors. Just a cursory reading of the Mahabarata is enough to convince a person, once they realize the ancient texts aren't fairy tales but historical accounts about some pretty bizaare events. Several thoughts crossed my mind when I was contemplating the "tangled thread" of Enki's E.ABZU. Wires came to mind, as did some other form of technology, as did the possibility it was referring to a labyrnith of passageways. Personally, I think it was just the only way the person who saw it, could explain what he/she was seeing, which leads me to believe its a reference to the appearance of the technology, perhaps even a reference to various routes of the star gate.. If you're assuming the ancient texts were all fabrications, understand that you're basing that assumption on three hundred years or so of engrained belief of the German High Critics, who basically decided if its an old text, and if it mentions a supernatural force, it must be a fabrication, a fairy tale, a myth. I disagree. I think the ancient texts are historical. |
| undo |
Anyway, somewhere along the line, the original story of Enki's E.ABZU (the floating/flying/talking/roaring palace) was mingled with Egyptian tales about Ra, the sun god. How this particular confusion happened, I'm not yet certain. In the meantime, consider these words as presented by egyptologist, E. A. Wallis Budge:
Be this as it may, it seems that the "self-created and self-begotten" god Ra had been ruling over mankind for a very long time, for his subjects were murmuring against him, and they were complaining that he was old, that his bones were like silver, his body like gold, and his hair like lapis-lazuli. -- You can see echoes of the description of Enki's E.Abzu in the bolded part of the sentence. His bones were like silver: et.al, the interior is silver. His body like gold: et.al, the outside was covered in a gold colored metal. And his hair like lapis-lazuli: et.al, decorations, lights, designs in blue color perhaps? I bring this up because this is an opening quote made by Budge in regards to the Legend of Re and Hathor. The opening paragraphs are equally interesting, for example: "The legend takes us back to the time when the gods of Egypt went about in the country, and mingled with men and were thoroughly acquainted with their desires and needs. The king who reigned over Egypt was Ra, the Sun-god" [...] "When Ra heard these murmurings he ordered his bodyguard to summon all the gods who had been with him in the primeval World-ocean, and to bid them privately to assemble in the Great House, which can be no other than the famous temple of Heliopolis." ---- The interesting part about these particular quotes is the reference to the Primeval World-Ocean (this is the Abzu, the Abyss, the Bottomless Pit, the Star Gate) and the Great House, which no doubt is the E.ABZU, where the Abzu gate was located. The Egyptian story is speaking of the exploits of the Anunnaki! What happens next is very interesting: "When Ra entered the Great Temple, the gods made obeisance to him, and took up their positions on each side of him, and informed him that they awaited his words. Addressing Nu, the personification of the World-ocean, Ra bade them to take notice of the fact that the men and women whom his Eye had created were murmuring against him. He then asked them to consider the matter and to devise a plan of action for him, for he was unwilling to slay the rebels without hearing what his gods had to say. In reply the gods advised Ra to send forth his Eye to destroy the blasphemers, for there was no eye on earth that could resist it, especially when it took the form of the goddess Hathor. Ra accepted their advice and sent forth his Eye in the form of Hathor to destroy them, and, though the rebels had fled to the mountains in fear, the Eye pursued them and overtook them and destroyed them. Hathor rejoiced in her work of destruction, and on her return was praised by Ra, for what she had done. The slaughter of men began at Suten-henen (Herakleopolis), and during the night Hathor waded about in the blood of men. Ra asserted his intention of being master of the rebels, and this is probably referred to in the Book of the Dead, Chapter XVII., in which it is said that Ra rose as king for the first time in Suten-henen. Osiris also was crowned at Suten-henen, and in this city lived the great Bennu bird, or Phoenix, and the "Crusher of Bones" mentioned in the Negative Confession. ----- In the actual story, Ra first sends his Eye which seeks out the hidden places, then he sends his Eye in the form of Hathor, who does the same thing. This is obviously a mixture of concepts. Somewhere in that story is a further description of what happened before the flood. Read the story here: http://www.africawithin.com/kemit/legend1.htm Egyptologists theorize that the Osirieon at Abydos, Egypt, was a model of the Primeval Abyss and the Primeval mountain rising out of the Abyss. http://www.phouka.com/pharaoh/egypt/photos/abydos/osireon-01.html http://www.phouka.com/pharaoh/egypt/photos/abydos/osireon-02.html This primeval abyss and mountain they refer to, was in fact, Enki's E.Abzu and Abzu. It wasn't a fictitious place at all, and in fact, is evidenced in the ancient cylinder seals that predate ancient Egypt's civilization. In the Legend of Ra and Hathor, are traces of the antediluvian knowledge regarding Enki's "ziggurat" and the Abzu, that Nimrod brought to Egypt. The question is, where was the mistake in the translation: Were the historical accounts mixed together and to what degree? Did someone improperly translate the egyptian hieroglyphics? What exactly happened in the past to cause these two accounts to become so entangled or appear to be so entangled? Did the ancient egyptians make ancient technology, spacecraft and their pilots into personifications and deifications? It appears at some level they did! It doesn't discount Ra (Re)'s existence, but it does hint that he and the structure the "Great House" were combined into one element, just as his eye and Hathor as his eye, were combined into one element. Originally, however, I'm guessing they were separate things entirely! In regards to the Anunnaki being different than the Igigi, this is a falsehood in my estimation. According to the sumerian online dictionary, the akkadian word "igigi" was only different because it was a different civilization. The akkadian culture followed the sumerian one. Here's the reason: A GI http://psd.museum.upenn.edu/epsd/psl/img/popup/Odqg.png 1. to deflower Akk. naqābu "to penetrate sexually, deflower". Notice the second symbol actually looks like intercourse? Well "gi" has the same symbol external image The GI glyph is sexual intercourse, perhaps even depicting forcible intercourse (et.al, "rape", abduction and rape, and so on). So put the "EYE" Inu concept together with the GI concept. Eye of the Sun Gods, the Watchers, with GI for having or forcing sexual intercourse. Same folks. Same bat time, same bat channel. Let's consider Nimrod's role in all this. I've been studying his role a little more indepth as of late. If you recall from earlier in this thread, I discussed how Nimrod was the first antediluvian world Emperor. He was also known as Osiris, Enmerkar, and Gilgamesh (he would have had an equivalent imperial "god" name in India and China, but at this point, I'm not sure what the names were). Anyway, when Nimrod fails to reopen the Abzu stargate during the Tower of Babel scenario, he leaves the area and heads to Egypt. Whether he was alive or dead at this point, I'm unsure, however there is one thing of interest to me at this juncture: According to the ancient sumerian texts, there were at least 2 star gates in ancient Sumer: the gate at Eridu (The Abzu) and the gate at Nibru (The Dur.anki). The one at Eridu was buried under the flood waters and retrieved a few hundred years later, by Nimrod, during his attempt to rebuild Enki's "E.ABZU" Temple on the same exact spot. This was called the Tower of Babel in biblical texts and the Etemenanki in earlier babylonian texts. When he failed to open the gate and the Etemenanki was destroyed, the gate was reburied (by God, according to the biblical texts) in such a way as to resist removal, usage or discovery, and Nimrod vacates the area and travels to Egypt with his entourage. In the meantime, what happened to the Dur.anki gate? Since no mention is made of it, I'm going to assume, for the sake of conjecture, that Nimrod retrieved it and ran with it to Egypt. Once he gets to Egypt (remember now, he's the Egyptian Osiris), he founds the city of Abydos (Egyptian Abdju pronounced Abzu), builds the Osirieon chamber and stuffs the Dur.anki in it. The whole thing is kept a hush hush secret. When Osiris (Nimrod) and his entourage eventually die, the secret chamber is not revealed to their predecessors and it lays hidden for at least a millenia, passing into legend. Eventually the Pharaoahs begin to search for it at Abydos, believing that Osiris (Nimrod) is actually buried there. They start digging up the ancient city and find other kings chambers but never that of Osiris, that is, until Seti I. Seti I decides to have his own temple built in Abydos. During the excavations for the foundations of his temple, his workers run smack into the Osirieon where it has laid buried for a very long time, under the sand. As a result, that last portion of Seti I's temple can't be built and has to turn a corner, creating an L shape temple (a total departure from all the other temples). He has the men construct an underground passageway that attaches the Osirieon to his own temple, refurbishes the Osirieon for any wear and tear, and claims it as his own. No mention is given of what he found in the Osirieon, although modern day archaeologists and egyptologists believe it is a scale model of the primeval ocean and primeval mountain (et.al, Enki's E.ABZU and Abzu). They were partially correct, since the "mountain" portion was entirely missing. This brings up a whole new set of questions: 1. Did Seti I find the Dur.anki where Nimrod had hidden it in the Osirieon? (IF indeed he did hide it or even take it from its burial site in Iraq) 2. If Seti I found it, where'd it go? There are several potential places he could've moved it to, including a) His own temple at Abydos b) His Temple at Memphis c) His tomb in the Valley of the Kings d) He left it in the Osirieon 3. If Seti I placed it in any of those places, where is it now? Who found it? The only potential candidates, at this juncture, are: a) The people who discovered Seti I's temple at Abydos b) The people who discovered his temple at Memphis c) The people who discovered his tomb in the Valley of the Kings d) The people who re-discovered the Osirieon. Also there are several other places it might have been put in, but since it was such a secret chamber to begin with, I'm assuming Seti I would've been as secretive about it as Nimrod had been. Perhaps there was an explanation or warning left with it, that Seti I read, understood and took the necessary precautions - that this was a device of the "gods" and should be kept away from the common people. It was during Seti I's life, before his burial, btw, that the Book of Gates was written (from what I can tell). Following this theory, he might've found the gate, tried to make sense of it, had his scribes and priests help him write it into a funerary text which supported their own theories and prior funerary texts such as the Book of What is in the Duat, the Book of the Netherworld and the Book of the Dead and then had the entire thing engraved into his alabaster sarcophagus. To add a layer of curiosity to it, there's a corridor (the "K" passageway) in Seti I's tomb in the Valley of the Kings, that hasn't been entirely excavated. There's indication that the hieroglyphics continue on, but the excavations stopped. Why? Curiously, they hit the water table, and still discovered the glyphs continued down, into the water level, and yet, didn't continue their excavations! It was stated on the official "Valley of the Kings" website, that continuing excavations down the K corridor were set to be reinstated in 2001 but nothing further has been revealed to the public. In fact, the article makes it sound as if the project wasn't approved by the authority for Egyptian antiquities. |
| undo |
There were at least 2 gates in the ancient sumerian stories.
Gate #1 belonged to Enlil, the sumerian god. It was at his city called Nibru (later known as Nippur) in the area of Iraq. It was called the "Dur.Anki", and meant, "Heaven-Earth Bond". It was occassionally referred to as the Abzu, because it was also underground, beneath his "temple". I theorize this is why it was occassionally called the Abzu, otherwise it was known only as the Dur.Anki. It went to the throneroom or courtyard of "An" somewhere in the heavens. "An" was the anunnaki god who rarely, if ever, interacted with humans or hybrids. Gate #2 belonged to Enki (Enlil's brother), he was also a sumerian god. It was at his city called Eridu (Cain's Arratu) in the area of Iraq. It was called the "Abzu" and meant "Abyss", which had something to do with fresh water, a meeting chamber, and a doorway to some other place, that was dark and bad. It was underground, beneath Enki's temple. It went to a place called the "Land of No Return" (for humans, that is) and had a few other obscure names. This, I theorize, is the "Bottomless Pit" of Revelation 9, due to its owner and location . Someone suggested that the gates may have been powered by some type of crystal that could only be "tuned" for one destination (at least, one destination at a time?). This fits in fairly well with the sumerian stories, since the Dur.Anki was only stated as going to "the courtyard of An" in the heavens. Quote from Peter Goodgame's "Giza Discovery": Zahi Hawass himself explains that the Giza Plateau was known by the Egyptians as the "House of Osiris, Lord of the Underground Tunnels." http://www.redmoonrising.com/Giza/OsirisTomb1.htm His reference for the quote is: http://www.towers-online.co.uk/pages/shaftos1.htm A page written about the special in which Hawass was going to open a new tomb found by the Great Pyramid that he believed held a burial spot or THEE burial tomb of the literal Osiris. it's interesting to note that Hawass believes Osiris literally existed but doesn't believe he was cut into 14 pieces by his evil brother. Mayhaps he has found out something about that particular legend and is just not sharing the knowledge of his discovery. Or could be he's just got his own ideas. Either way, his belief that Osiris was literally buried there, is rather surprising considering the hard line he usually takes on subjects related to ancient Egypt. From the Shabaka Stone: This is the land ////// the burial of Osiris in the House of Sokar. ////// Isis and Nephthys without delay, for Osiris had drowned in his water. Isis [and Nephthys] looked out, [beheld him and attended to him]. Horus speaks to Isis and Nephthys: "Hurry, grasp him ///." Isis and Nephthys speak to Osiris: "We come, we take you ///." ////// [They heeded in time] and brought him to [land. He entered the hidden portals in the glory of the lords of eternity]. //////. [Thus Osiris came into] the earth at the royal fortress, to the north of [the land to which he had come...] Peter Goodgame thinks the north of the land is north of Egypt. This is not correct, if I'm to understand the rest of the hints in the passage. Instead, it was a hint as to the location of the Osirieon, which was found in the north of Abydos. This also confirms that the gate was in the Osirieon - "He entered the hidden portals.... [...] Thus Osiris came into the earth at the royal fortress to the north of (Abydos) [the land to which he had come]. " the Epic of Gilgamesh, he must travel to find the sumerian-akkadian version of Noah, to learn the secret of immortality. His travels lead him to Mount Mashu, at which there is a "gate", guarded by two Scorpion-Beings. I believe now, that the scorpion reference is somehow connected to the reptilian thing. Recall also, that the creatures that come out of the bottomless pit, which I believe is a star gate (this is gonna get pretty bumpy so hold unto your hats), are described as appearing partially like scorpions, locusts, women and lions. They fly, presumably the locust reference, which may be a spacecraft of some sort. They have long hair or something that appears like long hair (Some theorize that this is just the only way John could describe jetwash or whatever that's called, where you can visibly see the jet slicing through the air and pushing shimmering waves to either side). They have sharp teeth, like a lion - which at this point, could mean almost anything. And a tail like a scorpion. The first instinct is to assume they are some kind of demonic chimeras. The second is to portray them with human made technology, such as an apache helicopter with teeth painted on its nose. However, because of their point of origin (the bottomless pit), I'm assuming they are flying in UFOs. The only possible way this may not be true is if the bottomless pit is referring specificially to the ocean, in which they would be more likely to be submarine launched missiles. The problem with that is, it doesn't fit alot of the surrounding information, including the info about the Abzu. So let's assume for the moment that it is indeed a star gate that opens and lets these locust/lion/long-haired?/scorpion things out. Now if you'll recall from my previous posts and e-books, I believe that the bottomless pit is the same thing as Enki's ABZU, which was a star gate in the chamber below his "temple" called the E.ABZU (my theory). I've also found some evidence to suggest, Enki's temple and therefore the ABZU, was smack in the middle of Eden. Afterall, he's the sumerian equivalent of the biblical Satan and Lucifer. It says in the sumerian texts that his temple is connected to the "Field Constellation" and faces towards the "Chariot Constellation." The chariot was the foundation for the "Cherubim" depictions seen in later temples, as they were part of God and the god's transportation, if you will. His "chariot." You can see depictions of them at the entrances to the Babylonian gates, as winged, man-headed beasts who would pull the chariots of the gods (man's attempt at describing the vehicles of the "divine"). I found a constellation chart from Babylonian times in which the Chariot constellation is depicted. You can see it here: http://phoenixandturtle.net/images/pegasus.jpg Compare it to the sumerian depiction of the ABZU, guarded by two beings holding odd looking poles with rings on them (the fiery swords???), long hair/beards with weird stuff around their heads and very tall. Here: http://freepages.history.rootsweb.com/~catshaman/13comp/abzu.JPG Notice that in the depiction of the Constellation, several ideas are presented - the Great Square of Pegasus (I-Iku) as a rectangle, surrounded by rivers, represented by Pisces constellation (The fish). This is, I believe, a depiction of Eden. ... in the sky. As the ancients created a grid of the sky and mirrored it on the Earth, this places Enki's ABZU and the star gate, smack in the middle of Eden. However, Eden was divided into parts, I noticed, while reading the texts. It was composed of Fields and A GARDEN. So presumably, the portion inhabitated by Satan was the Field (remember the Field Constellation is the same thing as I-Iku, the Great Square of Pegasus), since the bible says he was the craftiest beast of the "field". But somewhere within that same "Great Square" was also the Garden. If it is also at Enki's E.ABZU, the new question is, did the star gate, at one time, connect to Eden somewhere in the Pegasus constellation? I know it sounds crazy, so there is an alternative explanation which I will offer following this particular theory. Anyway, Adam and Eve get tossed out, and the gate is blocked by two "cherubim", who are apparently more than simply beastly vehicles (they are also living beings, thus the "human" head on the cherubim). I'm guessing that when they blocked the way to "Eden", they were not in the form of "Vehicle." There's something here, and I just can't put my finger on it. Now, let's go back to Gilgamesh on his trek to find Noah in "Paradise" (presumably Eden), so that he can learn the secret of immortality. He arrives at the gate of Mount Mashu, through which he must travel a dark journey to the other side, where he finds Paradise and Noah - so, following the theory, this gate is the gate to Paradise and its being guarded by two "Scorpion-Beings". But before he can go on this journey, he has to get permission from the two "Scorpion-Beings" who are guarding the Gate. Besides the fact the name of the mountain is wrong (it was, afterall, written AFTER the flood) and doesn't really etymologically resemble "E.ABZU" or even "ABZU" for that matter, the question remains - did Gilgamesh travel, in the story, through star gates, to Paradise? And were these star gates, the same ones that are also called the bottomless pit? If indeed the gate was a star gate, this could be easily explained -afterall, a star gate doesn't have to have just one destination. When Gilgamesh emerges on the other side, he finds trees growing gemstones and crystals instead of fruit. And of course, he finds Noah. The alternative theory is, that Mount Mashu of the Epic of Gilgamesh is the same Mount Mashu in China, and that the dark journey is threw a cave system that leads from one side of the mountains to the other, from which he emerges into a well hidden valley known as "Paradise" or "Shangri-la." http://www.thestargates.com/image/comparison.jpg NOTE: In the text, it says God set "Cherubim" (plural) and not a cherub (singular). So the typical biblical artist's depiction of one cherub is not correct. It's also significant to note that in their sumerian appearance, they were mostly humanoid looking and bipedal (perhaps this depicts them sans vehicle. When winged, they are depicting Cherubim in their conveyances?) Anyway, comparisons: Gates (enki's abzu gate in Eden) (enlil's dur.anki gate in nibru) (gates of eden - biblical) (gates of paradise - epic of gilgamesh) Gate Guardians (cherubim of eden gates- biblical) (guardians of the abzu gate - sumerian) (scorpion-beings of mount mashu gates - akkadian) (sphnixes/griffons of babylon gates - babylonian (note, although city gates, i believe they are trying to depict the cherubim of eden gates) The Cherubim as Vehicle is comparative to what would later develop into the Pegasus constellation (for similar reasons), and depicted as griffons and sphinxes (with wings) that would guard the gates and block entrance to Eden (or Paradise). Thusly why they are incorporated into throne motifs and why you see them incorporated into God's conveyance in Ezekiel. Apparently there are two things going on in the guise of cherubim - one being something to do with a moving vehicle, a form of transport, and the other perhaps being the primary occupants of this particular type of transport or perhaps the operators of it. This part is very vague. |
| undo |
According to biblical texts, Lucifer (Satan, Enki) was adorned with precious stones. It dawned on me while viewing this "doll" excavated from Enki's ERIDU, that this might in fact, be Enki. In other words, this may be the real Satan - some type of "Gray" ET:
http://thestargates.com/image/enki.jpg The above image is taken from the Oriental Institute, Oxford University: http://oi.uchicago.edu/OI/IRAQ/dbfiles/objects/11.htm It says in the biblical texts that we willl be surprised when we finally see Satan, at the judgement. No doubt! If he was a gray, with the spindly legs and such, that would certainly be a hard connection to make. We envision him as huge, with horns and cloven hooves and sharp pointy teeth. But what if, in reality, he's just a dinky, spindly guy, who apparently can shape shift or something. Count the visible fingers on this hand (hint: the opposable thumb is hiding): http://thestargates.com/image/six.jpg And this is the side view of Enki (remember the sumerian texts called him the "Great Dragon" - pretty dinky for a "dragon" but there he is, nonetheless. This piece is thought to be circa 4000 BC: http://thestargates.com/image/side.jpg The E.ABZU of Sumer, Enki's "Ziggurat", was the Great Mooring Place of Heaven and Earth, as was Enlil's E.KUR, also in Sumer, presumably because they both contained star gates. Enki's floating/flying city of Eridu, was composed entirely of silver and covered in gold. If it was built in a marsh, it would sink. Even if it was built on an island in a marsh, it would sink. So let's assume for the moment, that it wasn't built in a swamp or marshland, and therefore the Abzu is not a watery place in the normal sense of the word. It's not the Abyss in the modern day sense of Abyss (et.al, it ain't the ocean, it ain't a swamp, nor a marsh, etc). Water is connected to it, yes, but it isn't in the water literally. It came up from the Abzu. It came out of the Abzu. I've read different versions of this. It was built in the Abzu and rose up from the Abzu. Etc. So what we have here is a riddle. It's not an easy black and white solution. All the pieces of the puzzle need to come into play in order to fully understand what the text is saying. To claim it was simply built in the Abzu as if the Abzu were a geographical body of land, is rather presumptious considering that word "Abzu' has something to do with water. So let's consider what it has to do with water: According to mainstream theories, the water is underground fresh water aquifers. Problem - if the water is underground, why's the text treating it as if it's above ground so that it actually lends itself to the name of the place where Eridu is "built"? Was it a fresh water spring? If so, why's he building his city on top of a fresh water spring? Or better yet, what's the deal with this fresh water spring, when the Euphrates is right there and fresh. It doesn't flow in from the gulf, it flows down from the mountains. Skeptics, put on your thinking caps and re-read Enki and the World Order. Carefully. Think about what you're reading. It's a history of ancient Sumer. Treat it like it is. From Enki and the World Order: Your great house is founded in the Abzu, the great mooring-post of heaven and earth. http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-...l.cgi?text=t.1.1.3&charenc=j# From Enlil in the E.KUR: He has taken up residence in Nibru, the lofty bond between heaven and earth. http://web.archive.org/web/200502...ry.com/Sumer/sumer-enlil-ekur.htm Check this out, also from Enlil in the E.KUR: Its interior is a wide sea which knows no horizon. http://web.archive.org/web/200502...ry.com/Sumer/sumer-enlil-ekur.htm ?? Whatcha think he's talking about. Whatdya wanna bet, the original word for "sea" in that verse is actually "Abyss" and the translators didn't realize it was a reference to Enlil's Abzu! the translation would then be: Its interior is a wide (abzu/abyss) star gate which knows no horizon. |
| undo |
In Nibiru and Wormwood I discuss what I believe to be the real identity of Wormwood. Sitchinites believe it will be Planet X otherwise known as Nibiru. Although there's no reason to believe that Planet X doesn't exist, its name is not Nibiru. Nibiru or Nibru, was a city in ancient Mesopotamia. In fact, it was the city of Enlil, one of the anunnaki gods, and is today known as Nippur (on archaeological or historical maps).
Anyway, I identify Wormwood as a massive mothership ufo in the e-book, "Nibiru and Wormwood." The reason for this interpretation is first related to my belief that fallen angels are primarily responsible for most ufo sightings and abductions. In the book of Revelation, whenever a star is said to be falling to earth or is hurled to earth, it is later or immediately identified (in the same chapter) as a fallen angel. So as Wormwood is first described as a huge falling star, I immediately recognize the symbol as a "huge" fallen angel or rather a fallen angel (or angels) in a huge ufo. Translated this means, when the prophetical text in Revelation 8 describes Wormwood as a huge star that falls to the earth, it's actually describing a gigantic, glowing ufo descending to earth - in otherwords, a mothership.. However, the clues don't end there, although some are more firmly buried in the past, a past that goes all the way back to ancient Sumer. Let's take, for example, the word "Wormwood." It's my belief that in addition to describing the poisoning of the earth's waters, that it is also etymologically connected to Enki's ABZU. The Abzu, if you'll recall from "The Anunnaki and the Abyss" is actually the equivalent of the Abyss and biblical bottomless pit, and it is a star gate (my theory). Wormwood is from the word Abysinthe, which oddly enough is etymologically related to the word Abys(s). The reason this is relevant is seen in the very next chapter, chapter 9, when a fallen angel descends from the sky and opens the bottomless pit or abyss. If read in succession without a chapter break (in other words, ignoring the designation of 9 being a new chapter), the events in chapter 9 could be viewed as a continued description of the events in chapter 8 in which Wormwood first appears and descends to the planet. As soon as Wormwood descends to the planet, the Abyss or Bottomless Pit is opened. A coincedence? Perhaps. But let's consider the next etymological clue.... A cursory study of the symbols in the sumerian text "Enki and the World Order" and "Enki's Journey to Nibru", reveals 2 things of importance: 1) An ancient and important "tree", with vines that spread across the heavens, which I believe is a metaphor for a map of various star gate routes accessible via Enki's Abzu star gate. 2) It's connection to a "worm" hole. You have a gate, you need a wormhole attached to that gate in order to use it for travel. I attempt to explain this in my newest e-book, "The Star*Gates", which has only 2 pages available for public viewing at this time. Here's 1 of the pages in question: http://www.thestargates.com/book/page2.html Consider also that the word "Worm" was another word for "Dragon" and as such is just heavy with associated symbols and metaphors, such as Wormwood depicting the "Worm" or "Dragon" or "Serpent" in the "Tree" (wood) of the Garden of Eden. So long story short, chapter 8 holds some heavy duty references that seem to be further clarified in chapter 9, in which the bottomless pit or abyss is opened. Interesting that this was seen in a vision by a guy in a roman prison some 2000 years ago. And let's take a gander at Enlil's E.KUR, and the "other" star gate. Here's an interesting passage in the ancient sumerian text called "Enlil in the E.KUR" He has taken up residence in Nibru, the lofty bond between heaven and earth. [...] The front of the city is laden with terrible fearsomeness and radiance. [...] Its interior is a wide sea which knows no horizon. In its ...... glistening as a banner, the bonds and ancient divine powers are made perfect. [...] Its brickwork is red gold, its foundation is lapis lazuli. [...] Enlil , holy Urac is favoured with beauty for you; you are greatly suited for the Abzu, the holy throne ; you refresh yourself in the deep underworld, the holy chamber. Your presence spreads awesomeness over the E-kur, the shining temple, the lofty dwelling. [...] Its fearsomeness and radiance reach up to heaven, its shadow stretches over all the foreign lands, and its crenellation reaches up to the midst of heaven. [...] He alone is the prince of heaven, the dragon of the earth. [...] Enlil , your ingenuity takes one's breath away! By its nature it is like entangled threads which cannot be unraveled, crossed threads which the eye cannot follow. And this is from Enlil and Sud, another ancient sumerian text: At that time Enlil had not yet been given a wife in the E-kur; Ninlil's name was not yet famous in the Ki-ur. After travelling through Sumer and to the ends of the universe, he ......; in his search throughout the Land, Enlil, the Great Mountain, stopped at Erec. And one last one from "Enlil and Ninlil": Enlil approached the man of the Id-kura river of the underworld, the man-eating river. ---- I can't link these for you because they come from a website that is down at the moment and has been so for about a month. It can be found on the Way Back Machine at http://archive.org by typing http://earth-history/Sumer/ into the search box, then following the links on the bottom of the page once it loads. I just happened to have saved the sumerian section of the site to my computer. The Id-kura river mentioned in "Enlil and Ninlil" ("Enlil approached the man of the Id-kura river of the underworld, the man-eating river") is an interesting designation for a river. Apparently, the word "ID" means "river" and the word "kura" means one of several things. It's from the Akkadian "kuru" which means furnace, kiln, and kindling wood ( perhaps for their bright, sparking appearance) . So the Id-kura river of the underworld that eats men, is in fact, likened to a river of a furnace or a river that sparks like fire . the possible obvious interpretation is a - river of lava. But let's see how this plays out in light of the information concerning the sacred tree of these "holy" cities. According to the information regarding the "mec tree" of Enki's E.Abzu, the tree is likened to a cluster of branches that spreads across all the lands and the sky. I saw in the description examples of the biblical Trees in the Garden, such as the Tree of Good and Evil, in which the serpent resides. In the same text, Enki is likened to the Great Dragon, so not only does this hint at the "worm" (or serpent) hole, it also seems to suggest that the tree is itself a symbol of the wormhole. So, let's look at the description of the "river" again. It's a river of the underworld, that eats men. It has a firey, perhaps a shiny, glowing appearance, a sparking or sparkling appearance - maybe even red in color, or it generates a great deal of heat, perhaps. this seems to also tie into the opening of the Bottomless pit in Revelation 9, as the opening of it refers to smoke and fire rising up as its opened. Of course, the smoke may be steam, it's really hard to tell at this point. Considering this is yet another reference to the underworld, it seems a bit surprising that in this instance the "river" is firey or glowing, sparking, shining, in appearance, whereas the underworld entrance of Enki is watery in appearance - still, they are both Abzus, underground chambers, in which the gods "refresh" themselves, and are born from. I suppose it could be said these were just examples of enlil as a fire god and enki as a water god, but that's not exactly true. Enlil was the god of the air, the wind, not fire. Enlil would be more likened to Baal'zebub, the god of flies or the god of flying things or the god that flies or even, the god of the dead (referencing the preponderance of flies that accumulate on the corpse after death - which is not my interpretation of the god of flies but some dictionary definition. my interpretation is it's a reference to flying in ufos). More on the "Id-kura" river mentioned in "Enlil and Ninlil. There are two other translations of "kur" or "kura": Loom Wood The problem with either of them is their age in relation to the original text. the text predates them both by quite a bit, leading me to believe that the Akkadian translation is likely to be the closest, etymologically. The akkadian translation was furnace or kiln. So I'm thinking River of the furnace or River of the kiln, would be the most accurate, unless I missed something during my studies (Which is possible). this underworld "river of the furnace (or kiln)" wreaks havoc on the mainstream version, that the rivers of the underworld were specifically and exclusively water. In Enlil and Ninlil, the underworld river doesn't sound like water or at the very least, doesn't sound like any water I've ever heard of before unless the water was under the influence of something artificial. And more information. According to the pennsylvanian - sumerian dictionary, the word "ekur" meant prison or institution, thusly tying the references to the biblical bottomless pit being a prison for the "fallen angels" directly into Enlil's E.KUR (and his Dur.Anki (heaven-earth bond) presumably?). ekur [PRISON] (12x: ED IIIb, Old Akkadian, Ur III, Old Babylonian) wr. e2-kur "prison" Akk. şibittu http://psd.museum.upenn.edu/epsd/epsd/e1241.html A god study some correlations i'm guessing at so far: Sumerian "An" (Anu) is equivalent to Egyptian "On", "Anubis" and "Wepwaut." Sumerian "Enki" (Ea) is equivalent to biblical "Satan" (in some cases), Akkadian "Dumuzi", Egyptian "Ra", Egyptian "Ptah", Egyptian "Atum," and later, Babylonian "Tammuz" (truthfully, all of the fertility gods stem from Enki. Ra is the only sun god that derives some of his history from Ea, most notably references to his appearance and activities in the Legend of Ra and Hathor. Ptah as a creator god coincides with Enki's creative history, although Enki's history has parts in it that are potentially stolen either from Enlil or Jehovah, meaning that Ptah could potentially be equivalent to Jehovah or Enlil moreso than Enki-Ea. Atum is most likely a case of ancestor worship, stemming from biblical "Adam". In some cases, Ea is attributed with parts of Adam's history). Sumerian "Enlil" is equivalent to biblical "Baal" and later, Babylonian "Bel". In some cases, "Enlil"'s activities coincide with those of the biblical Jehovah. Akkadian "Shamash" shares the Egyptian "Ra" with Sumerian "Enki"/ Akkadian "Ea" or rather Egyptian Ra derives partially from Shamash and partially from Ea. Akkadian "Enmerkar" is equivalent to Egyptian "Osiris" and biblical "Nimrod" and later, Babylonian "Gilgamesh" Akkadian "Inana" is equivalent to Egyptian "Isis" and biblical "Ashtoreth" and later, Babylonian "Ishtar" Babylonian "Marduk" tried to lay claim to most or all of their deeds. my blog has some more of my radio interviews, all of them are free: http://sumerian.blogspot.com |
| undo |
It wouldn't surprise me at all about the Mars flood idea, because, from what I can tell, Enki is accused of creating the flood in at least one instance. It fits with my theory that Ra was modelled after Enki and his E.ABZU and that the appearance of Ra in the Legend of Ra and Hathor is in fact, a memory and metaphorical reference (however obscure) to Enki's E.ABZU. The man and the building became the same entity, and since I think the E.ABZU was in fact a spacecraft, it's not surprising that the ancient priests wrote them up as parts of the same thing with one name in some instances, and two names in others. Same goes for Hathor. If you read the Legend of Ra and Hathor, Hathor becomes the "Eye of Ra" - surely a weaponized spacecraft with, among other things, infrared capabilities that could "see" through solid rock. Also in the Legend of Ra and Hathor, Ra's "Eye" as a weapon, creates a flood of "red blood," which fits with the idea that Mars might be involved somehow (something I was avoiding without sufficient textual evidence, but which fits the pieces of scattered information if you connect the dots).
flood gates of the deep? has potential, i say. |
| undo |
Did Osiris really die?
You know there sure are alot of books out there that include Osiris among the dying and rising gods. But after studying his history, I'm not so sure he "died" in the sense we humans regard as death. For example, on the Shabaka Stone it says: This is the land ////// the burial of Osiris in the House of Sokar. ////// Isis and Nephthys without delay, for Osiris had drowned in his water. Isis [and Nephthys] looked out, [beheld him and attended to him]. Horus speaks to Isis and Nephthys: "Hurry, grasp him ///." Isis and Nephthys speak to Osiris: "We come, we take you ///." ////// [They heeded in time] and brought him to [land. He entered the hidden portals in the glory of the lords of eternity]. //////. [Thus Osiris came into] the earth at the royal fortress, to the north of [the land to which he had come...] The subject of the above is now a thread in its own right on ATS. You can read it here: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread226939/pg1 It may be possible that the ancient egyptians viewed the death of Osiris as bodily death, because they didn't understand what actually transpired. Then again, he may have died and they simply put him in the gate. Or when you die, you automatically go in the gate or eventually go in the gate. The gates could be "Spiritual" rather than technological in the sense we grasp it. They may be the source of the tunnels of light of near death experiences. I really don't know. All I can tell for certain, is they exist or existed, and will be apparent again at some point in the future. To me, this sounds like Osiris was rescued, "they heeded in time" and he entered the "hidden portals" (which were hidden in the earth in the north of Abydos - et.al, in the Osirieon). Did Osiris escape this life via death or did he use the hidden portals - "He entered the hidden portals" ? |
| undo |
According to the sumerian texts, Nibru was Enlil's city in ancient Sumer. It sounds to be the same thing as Enki's city, et.al, a floating, flying city, a ziggurat/pyramidal shape
extra-terrestrial craft, that contained or sat on top of a subterranean Abzu chamber. It sounds as if it had some kind of forcefield around it, that extended way above the structure. The text refers to the shield as a crenelation, but there's no indication it was what we would refer to as a crenelation today and no historical precedence for a shielding wall that was that much taller than the temple city it contained. Enlil's "E.KUR" (his spaceship (temple) at Nibru) was referred to as a prison of some sort in the translation of the word ekur (which means prison). I don't quite get that part, as it doesn't exactly make sense with other references to it, such as the time he abandoned it and the people mourned. Or the references to all the festivals that took place there. Admittedly, I haven't done enough study on Nibru yet, as I had been primarily focused on Eridu. However, I'm working on it. There's definitely something to crystals. Enlil's E.KUR was composed of crystal ( lapis lazuli) and metals (red gold). Enki's E.ABZU was decorated with crystals (lapis lazuli) and composed of metals (gold and silver). The great pyramid "King's Chamber" was composed of granite (90% crystal). The Osirieon was composed of red aswan granite (again, 90% crystal) and New City Jerusalem is composed of crystals of various kinds. -------------- Ashtar (Ishtar) is Isis. Esther was much later in the timeline. She was the queen of Xerxes I (Persian: خشایارشاه, Old Persian: Khashâyârshâ), was a Persian Emperor (Shahanshah) (reigned 485–465 BC) of the Achaemenid dynasty. |
| undo |
On the topic of women in ancient times:
None of the ancient religions, including paganism, treated women well. in fact, ancient greece was completely dominated by man-boy pedophilia. women were viewed as nothing but baby making machines. the same is true for ancient hinduism, especially the vedas, who said it was only a cause to celebrate if the child was a male. female children were and still are, killed, because the religion demands a high priced dowry for a bride. in fact, a lady from india did a study on the history of women in india and found that at one point, there were entire sections of the nation that had no women at all. they had killed so many of their female children, entire generations were growing to adulthood without children of their own. women were only conveniences and nothing more. eventually battles broke out between maharajis who would try to steal each other's remaining females. if the approaching army was seen in advance, the maharaji would have all the females brought to the center of town and burned alive, including old women, female infants, pregnant women, teenage females and so on. this also became a problem in ancient china. it got so bad, that eventually, gangs of roaming men who had no hope of ever having a family, became roaming armies. these armies were the ones that inevitably lead to the downfall of the chinese empire. As a side note: Since the 1970's AD to today (our time frame, in other words) over 150,000,000 chinese females are missing, either killed before they were born due to China's One Child policy and the old pagan belief that men are more useful than women, neglected until they died, or murdered after they were born in various ways. china's orphanages are filled with female children, with rarely a male in the bunch. This factoid is overlooked by most who like to extoll the virtues of how paganism has historically treated women. I think it's time to come to grips with it fellas - Men, no matter what religion or lack thereof, have historically treated women badly and it's not getting any better today. Now female unborns are killed out of convenience, since we are all just products of a survival of the fittest scenario, especially if the system in place is atheistic. I'm sorry to say so, but its the truth and has nothing to do with a single religious belief or lack of religious belief. The Anunnaki he says were so great, such as Enki, were no better. They raped women without regard, even very young females, and took whoever they wanted for wives. This isn't just mentioned in the bible and the hebrew pseudopigraphia, it's also in the sumerian texts. He's also wrong about Enki being a great guy. According to the people themselves, Enki was known as the tricky god, the crafty god. He tricked one guy, who had apparently travelled through Enlil's Dur.Anki star gate to a dinner with the "gods" (et.al with the anunnaki/fallen angels) out of the chance for immortality. Of course, the story is told in such a way that you can tell some important details are missing, but the point is the same - the guy was not only unreliable, he was the cause of humans losing the ability to have perfected, eternal bodies. This is NOT a biblical story!!! If you're gonna talk Sumer, tell the truth!!! I didn't have my reference links last night and now can't edit the post to add them, so here are the references: female gendercide, china, a photographic review of chinese orphanges (gruesome pics, don't look if you are squeamish): http://web.archive.org/web/200210...ww.dmcl.com/dying-rooms/page1.htm gendercide watch: http://www.gendercide.org/case_infanticide.html female gendercide in india, women in indo-aryan societies: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Ithaca/1335/Soc/w_ary.html Greek Pederasty, the practice of man-boy relations, "Education and Pederasty in Ancient Greece": http://www.truthtree.com/pederasty.shtml Enki, the Tricky god, "The Tablet of Adapa": file:///D:/earth%20history/Sumer/sumer-adapa.htm Enki as the confuser of languages (Tower of Babel scenario), "The Nam-Shub of Enki": http://deoxy.org/alephnull/nam-shub.htm Enki as usurper of the Mother Goddess tradition: http://www.ancientworlds.net/aw/Article/561290 Granted alot of this is confused with other stories, but the point is, if you're going to uphold Enki as some wonderfully benevolent being based on sumerian texts, consider everything said about him in your determinations. Evidence of Grecian female infanticide Death records and graves in various parts of the world show high infant and fetus sex ratios that seems hard to be explained by any other reason.(32) Infanticide had been practiced in different parts of the world. There is evidence that it was practiced in Ancient Greece, the early Roman Empire and in the Arab world.(33) http://7e.devbio.com/article.php?id=185 Alot of dead females, sorry to say, and usually for one reason or another, related to the supremacy of males vs. females, as workers, in society, in religion, and unfortunately, as is the case in modern day China, as a necessary evil. How do you stem the population growth? Remove the female members of the population and wallah, no more population growth. As a survival of the fittest scenario, it seems almost conspiratorially perfect (for the survivors, that is). Enki as usurper of the Mother Goddess tradition: http://www.ancientworlds.net/aw/Article/561290 He should also read Michael S. Heiser's study on the Divine Council http://www.thedivinecouncil.com/I...the%20Divine%20Council%20MTIT.pdf It's also interesting that blackshadowstallion claims Enki was the leader - this implies the same thing as saying Jehovah was the leader -- et.al, a supreme God at the head of a pantheon of lesser gods (high ranking angelic beings/ets), which, according to Heiser, is exactly what happened. Instead blackshadowstallion implies that if you believe Jehovah was the supreme god, you are a monotheist. But if you believe Enki was the supreme god, you're a pagan. He just needs to get his facts straight, especially as they pertain to Enki. I'd like to add to the above post, that i had a waking vision one day about four or five years ago. I was sitting in my house, middle of the day, at my computer. Suddenly, I was hurtling threw the air, up into the area of space around the planet where the satellites circumnavigate the globe. I saw 2 holographic looking male entities, just floating in space where the satellites are. They had long dark hair, but no beards. They were human looking. I could see them from the collar bone to the top of their heads, as if they were sitting at a console (which later would be a confirmation that it was a reference to the council (see michael s. heiser's info on the divine council, which at that point, i hadn't read, nor did i know anything about it). The whole experience lasted about 1 second, but I learned alot in that 1 second. The first thing I learned was that the beings I saw do not like human beings, and they especially don't like human women. I was not supposed to be able to see them, BECAUSE I was a woman. This explains alot about how things work as regards women in the world today. There's a pervasive anti-female undercurrent, all over the world. It's everywhere. In the brotherhoods, the religions, in politics, even in anti-religious organizations. I'm surprised how many people are unaware of it, or can't see it. I don't mean this as a feminist - it's simply the truth of the matter. I'm telling the truth as far as I know it. I believe this all hearkens back to Enki's usurpation of the mother goddess tradition. Once it was decided upon, that was it. Women became second fiddle to his Satanic Majesty and everything that followed, was a regurgitation of the same thing. All the laws regarding women have been basically laid out by and according to his influence. Even women took part in perpetuating this because they were under the authority of men, the divine council and Satan (Enki), and had little choice in the matter and often did so as a matter of survival. In fact, a cursory view of history, be it ancient or modern, in the world, shows this pattern repeats everywhere, regardless of the religious or non religious affiliation. When the bible says Satan is in control of the planet right now, it ain't kidding. Notice it is almost exclusively a survival of the fittest scenario and how this is the very thing being taught in our schools today. Have you ever wondered why? What happens when the population of the planet is out of control? How do you fix it? War? Disease? Or better yet, remove enough females from the populace, and the problem is solved. In a survival of the fittest scenario, women are the first to go, ESPECIALLY, female unborns, female newborns and female infants. Darwin calls it natural selection. I call it Satanic selection. It's the nature of the beast. And a beast it is. Anyway, as regards my vision experience, 1 second later, I was back in my chair in my house. My skin felt like pins and needles everywhere, a sort of numbing sensation, like when you sit on your foot too long and the circulation is cut off and the foot starts to feel like little pin pricks all over it. I wrote the entire thing off as a momentary lapse of sanity. But an hour later, both of my young children emerged from their perspective bedrooms complaining that it felt like it was raining in the house. This was not only confirmation of the validity of the vision experience, it was also confirmation of a "manifestation." I wasn't scared till then. My motherly instincts kicked in because now I was worried it might hurt my children! Lemme tell ya that old adage is true - there ain't nothing as dangerous as a mother trying to defend her kids. My personal belief is that the teachings of Jesus (not the teachings of his discples, who were men subject to the world system, but Jesus' teachings) show a completely different picture regarding how women should be treated than most other belief systems on the planet. When the woman who had been caught in adultery was about to be stoned, Jesus taught a very important lesson about the human condition and how it interplays with those who are under the "authority" of man. He proved (to me, anyway) that although men have been superior in authority on this planet, that their decisions and usage of that authority where women are concerned is a very critical point - if you have the authority and misuse it, it's no different than if you had sinned the same sin yourself. In fact, that entire scenario served to prove every man who had been present at the impromptu stoning of that woman had done just as grievious if not more grievious sins than she had. And here they were, rocks in hand, about to pelt her into the next life. Jesus knew the score, that being that men who abuse their authority over women by making laws and religious codes that harm women, have screwed up royally. They've bought into the Satanic system. The world system is a destroyer of women. And that world system is clearly in the purview of Enki (who is Satan). Open your eyes or face thousands of years of abused, murdered, raped women and female children/infants/unborns, who will be standing at the judgement saying "What the freak dude?!" And like the men at the stoning of the woman accused of adultery, you will have no recourse or defense. If you would claim Jesus as your defense, why not follow his example and stop abusing, murdering and raping women? How hard would it be for these rich men who make the laws, to take steps to preserve life rather than destroy it? Why not spend some of the trillions of dollars that exchange hands between wealthy organizations and world powers, to find alternatives to abusing your females? You have the authority, so what's your excuse? It may be God-given authority but as Jesus so elegantly demonstrates, it's authority that has much responsibility - don't get caught with your pants down. Okay, so you're stronger physically and can overpower a woman. Do you think deliberately overpowering a woman will go unaccounted if you aren't caught by the laws that do try to protect women? Isn't it also rather poignant, that these same try to say Jesus doesn't exist and the afterlife judgement is just a figment of the imagination? Rather convenient self-denial. A paradigm that not only favors them as men in this life, but favors them forevermore, regardless of what they do in this life, as they never have to make an accounting for their behavior or make any attempts to change it or even feel a pang of guilt about it - ever. Some try to point out that christian men have been some of the worst perpetrators of that and their solution was to simply ask forgiveness -- no eye for an eye required. Oh hog wash. The whole planet is ripe with it. And at least christian men feel some remorse. A male rapist who thinks there's no judgement after this life, has the best of all worlds! He doesn't even have to feel guilty! He can just rape pillage plunder and go about his business afterwards, since there's no comeuppance --- EVER. |
| undo |
On the subject of Islam
You can see yet more references to the ancient gates, in the lore of the islamics. For example, they believe the Mahdi entered a well and will return from a well as a Messiah figure - to me, this sounds like a star gate reference that has been somehow passed down and converted into a "well" story. Since Islam doesn't come about until a very long time after the biblical prophecies were originally written, we need to refer back to the mention of a being emerging from the bottomless pit that might also correspond to the Mahdi. This does indeed happen in the book of Revelation. It says something to the effect, that a being of some sort, who wields a great deal of power and influence (part of the "antichrist" trio of beast, whore, false prophet), rises out of the bottomless pit. For it to rise out of the bottomless pit, the thing has to be opened already. Since there's no way to determine the exact opening date or if it isn't already opened, the rest is still shrouded in the events of some futurescape or some hidden presentscape. |
| undo |
On Pre-Adamite civilization
The theory is that the bible provides for a previous civilization on this planet before us. They became technologically advanced, went out into the solar system and beyond, inhabited some of the other planets and moons, created traverseable wormholes accessible by a gate of some kind, which I just refer to as a star gate for lack of a better word. Their civilization crescendoed and self-destructed when they got into some kind of intergalactic battle with another civilization that was superior to them in every conceivable way. This is referred to in the biblical texts as the war in Heaven. Following the healing of the planet, it was re-terraformed and humanity was seeded on it by the victors of the war in Heaven. The previous inhabitants, who had lost the battle, while doing an inventory of the damage to their previous real estate, returned to this planet to find humans roaming around on it. This did not make them happy. Since they knew of the existence of the gates, they simply employed them to bring additional reinforcements from elsewhere in the universe, to assist them in taking back the planet. the first attempt to retake the planet was the infiltration of the human genome. The planet was rampant with hybrids. They polluted the planet so badly, it wasn't fit for human life and humans began to die in large numbers. The hybrids cannabalized them to top it off, as a survival of the fittest scenario. The flood arrived, the ETs were sent through the gate, exiled from the planet. Only the ones directly responsible were sent through the gates, however. New ones arrived and tried to start it all over again, this time, however, they were stymied at the Etemenanki (Tower of Babel), and the gates were re-buried (or the gate at Eridu (where the tower of babel was built) was reburied, at the very least). To keep this from happening again, a deal was made between the warring extra-terrestrial factions. Nimrod (egyptian Osiris), who was a god Emperor of the World at the time and a human hybrid, was murdered and his power re-distributed to 70 angelic beings (extra-terrestrials) of fallen nature (the ones who lost the war in Heaven), under the premise that although the humans appeared to prefer the fallen ones and the fallen lifestyle, there should be safeguards put in place to assure their continued survival. First on the agenda was to assure no humans would find the gates until a future date, when the final war would make it impossible to hide any longer. According to the biblical texts, the gate was buried (it's called the bottomless pit in the bible). They are not afraid that humans will find it because that is part of the prophecy regarding the bottomless pit - when its dug up and re-opened, that's when all hades breaks lose (literally). An angelic being of extra-terrestrial origin, returns here and opens it. My theory is that the fallen ones who were punished for nearly destroying the planet prior to the flood, were sent to some other place in the universe that is totally devoid of sentient life. It's called "outer darkness" and the timeframe for the prophecy fulfillment is based on how long it would take one of their motherships to get back here from there without access to star gates, wormholes and within the limits of light speed travel. With the current information, the original burial of the gates was during the mesopotamian flood, circa 3800 BC or thereabouts, which means about 6000 years have passed since the gates were buried. Since we don't know the extent of their abilities nor the distance between outer darkness and earth, we don't know how long it will take, even at or near the speed of light. |
| undo |
On the Subject of Historical Revisionism
This is the problem with our current understanding of the past - it's been filtered not once, but twice, through the "truth machine", and in both cases, their conclusions were based on their understanding of their science. Not our science or the science of the ancient peoples but their science. The first time it was at the onset of the dark ages. The second time it was at the end of the dark ages, and in both cases, it was still very dark. They knew very little about archaeology at the time. German higher criticism relied on their science to make sense of the ancient past and they not only colored the direction skepticism would take (skepticism is present in every era on this planet, it's just not always the main paradigm), they also determined what would be written in our history books, which inevitably determined how archaeologists would view the past, and how scientists would approach the issues of the extraordinary. The things we do today with common technology, would've been considered fairy tales and nonsense to them, yet we take their word for it that the ancient past was not super or hyper natural at all. How would they know? They wouldn't recognize it if they read about it. We, on the other hand, have the beneift of hindsight from a more informed perspective. Let's not waste it. |
| undo |
On the subject of NASA conspiracy theory:
I received an email recently that provides a potential (additional) clue to the interpretation of "Wormwood." Very very interesting. Wormwood (Absinthe) is used as a medicine to expel WORMS! Notice the very next event after the arrival of Wormwood is the opening of the abyss (the star gate), at which point it begins to expel locust thingies. In the email it mentioned that Wormwood is from the genus Artemisia (is it just my imagination or are some of these modern names pointing at the ancient past in some very odd ways?), named after Artemis (the moon goddess who was a virginal huntress), who's brother is....wait for it... wait.... wait....... Apollo. (the leader of the Abyss/Bottomless Pit/Star Gate is "Apollyon", another name for Apollo (as the Destroyer)) Connecting these particular dots is getting kinda spooky. |
| undo |
On the Subject of Reptilians
Oh and for the benefit of those who think the Worms in this instance are not "reptilian", observe this verse : Revelation 17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is. And what was the beast he saw? Why a dragon (a reptilian in a flying machine, perhaps?), of course! Revelation 17:3 a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. compare to Revelation 12: 3-4 3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. 4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born. Notice how in verse 4 it says his tail drew a third part of the stars of heaven and cast them to the earth -- in Revelation, falling stars are fallen angels. And as you know from my previous writings, I believe they are piloting UFOs or some type of spacecraft when it says they "fall to the earth." So essentially, this is describing the head cheese, sending the entire host of the fallen, to the earth in UFOs. |
| undo |
On the Subject of Interpreting Biblical Prophetical Symbols
Marginally related study for the benefit of those who are unfamilar with Revelation and how the symbols are interpreted: A BEAST Study (according to placement in hierarchy) ---------------- The Great Red Dragon Revelation 12:3 a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. Note the CROWNS are on his heads. This indicates that he has power over the entire beast, including the seven heads (which are later identified as seven kingdoms. The Kings Revelation 13:1 a beast rise up out of the sea (betcha this said abyss originally!), having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. Note the CROWNS are on his horns! This indicates this organization is under the dominon of the Great Red Dragon from Rev. 12:3 The Religious Order Revelation 17: 3 a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. Note there are NO CROWNS on the heads or the horns of this beast. This one is under the dominion of the Kings and the Great Red Dragon. The crowns depict power in this instance, power in a hierarchal structure. It might be pertinent to note here that this was considered to be both the Pagan and later, Holy Roman Empire, by many eschatologists (scholars of biblical prophecy) for hundreds of years. Primarily because the seven heads are also said to be seven mountains and the Vatican sits smack in the middle of the seven hills of Rome. And although it may still be true, we need to ask a new question: What in the sam hill would the Vatican have to do with "star gates"? |
| undo |
On the Subject of Crystal Pyramids
It may have. I know New City Jerusalem is described as being composed of various crystals and precious stones. The streets are transparent like glass, and gold in color, for example. It flies, hovers, and lowers to the Earth. Pretty wild stuff, right in the last book of the bible. For those who haven't read it, here's the description from Revelation chapter 21: 10 He took me in spirit to a great, high mountain and showed me the holy city Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God. 11 It gleamed with the splendor of God. Its radiance was like that of a precious stone, like jasper, clear as crystal. 12 It had a massive, high wall, with twelve gates where twelve angels were stationed and on which names were inscribed, (the names) of the twelve tribes of the Israelites. 13 There were three gates facing east, three north, three south, and three west. 14 The wall of the city had twelve courses of stones as its foundation, on which were inscribed the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb. 15 The one who spoke to me held a gold measuring rod to measure the city, its gates, and its wall. 16 The city was square, its length the same as (also) its width. He measured the city with the rod and found it fifteen hundred miles in length and width and height. 17 He also measured its wall: one hundred and forty-four cubits according to the standard unit of measurement the angel used. 18 The wall was constructed of jasper, while the city was pure gold, clear as glass. 19 The foundations of the city wall were decorated with every precious stone; the first course of stones was jasper, the second sapphire, the third chalcedony, the fourth emerald, 20 the fifth sardonyx, the sixth carnelian, the seventh chrysolite, the eighth beryl, the ninth topaz, the tenth chrysoprase, the eleventh hyacinth, and the twelfth amethyst. 21 The twelve gates were twelve pearls, each of the gates made from a single pearl; and the street of the city was of pure gold, transparent as glass. 22 I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God almighty and the Lamb. 23 The city had no need of sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gave it light, and its lamp was the Lamb. Flippy no? It ties the last book of the bible into the stories of ancient Sumer's E.ABZU and E.KUR, thousands of years before. |
| undo |
Further reading:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread197741/pg33 |
| chaiyah |
http://www.holyconservancy.org/im...gate/00AVI.StarGatesOfTheGods.avi
Does this link work for you? It is a copy of Wm. Henry's original Stargates video, that he let me have. Chai |
| oba |
undo --->
I came across your thread @ ats. your findings r good high quality. you are doing a good job, and I guess we will be seeing your book soon eh? take care. 
R ps. the OT deity actually being an annunaki pharaoh makes more sense than anything else. edit: I'm wondering if Allah will be exposed also as a kind of psychic overlay. to me God is not a big scary creature, it is a life-principle which includes kindness and the golden rule. |