Archive for johnlearsmoon.myfastforum.org a forum for parties interested in john lears upcoming book the living moon and the conspiracies surrounding a populated solar system
 



       johnlearsmoon.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Shared Data
Matyas

The late great Heim

This work deserves its own thread. I find it peculiar that his work parallels my own with the major difference being I am working with a rotating virtual electron field and Heim is acclerating the electrons themselves to relativistic speeds. 11 light years in 80 days might seem fanciful, but here we have a hard core theoretician offering us the knowledge on a silver platter.

I intend to expand on this too in due time.
Lubomir

http://www.hpcc-space.com/

unfortunately there is no progress since several months. Looks like someone don't want this research to move forward Mad  They all concentrate on rockets, without thinking for the future Evil or Very Mad
johnlear

Lubomir wrote:
http://www.hpcc-space.com/

unfortunately there is no progress since several months. Looks like someone don't want this research to move forward Mad  They all concentrate on rockets, without thinking for the future Evil or Very Mad



I don't understand the mathematics here but the mere use of G indicates the formula is invalid.

G was proven in error by Pari Spolter in here 1993 book the Gravitational Force of the Sun where she shows that gravity is not the result of mass/density but the result of Keplers Third Law. Keplers Third Law mathematically stated is the force of gravity of a planet is equal to the acceleration (sidereal) times the area of a circle the radius of which is the mean distance betwen that planet and the sun.

This means that all planets is our solar system have generally the same gravity as earth including the moon.

The reason NASA seems to be concentrating on rockets is that is a cover for their real techonology.

You may have read or heard about NASA trying to reinvent the wheel or actually trying to recover the technology that was used in the Apollo program. They cannot recover it because it was never there. All we saw was a rocket take off (Saturn V) that had a lot of smoke and flames and allegedly took men to the moon.

Actually is was just smoke and mirrors. Apollo was faked. There is nothing to recover because there was nothing there in the first place,
Lubomir

johnlear wrote:


I don't understand the mathematics here but the mere use of G indicates the formula is invalid.

G was proven in error by Pari Spolter in here 1993 book the Gravitational Force of the Sun where she shows that gravity is not the result of mass/density but the result of Keplers Third Law. Keplers Third Law mathematically stated is the force of gravity of a planet is equal to the acceleration (sidereal) times the area of a circle the radius of which is the mean distance betwen that planet and the sun.

This means that all planets is our solar system have generally the same gravity as earth including the moon.
With other words they purposely look into wrong direction.

johnlear wrote:
The reason NASA seems to be concentrating on rockets is that is a cover for their real techonology.

You may have read or heard about NASA trying to reinvent the wheel or actually trying to recover the technology that was used in the Apollo program. They cannot recover it because it was never there. All we saw was a rocket take off (Saturn V) that had a lot of smoke and flames and allegedly took men to the moon.

Actually is was just smoke and mirrors. Apollo was faked. There is nothing to recover because there was nothing there in the first place,
Just like David Copperfield's tricks?

But it looks real Confused




And after 10 years they'll do it again?

The Soviet N1 program must have been the soviet cover up, right?

       johnlearsmoon.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Shared Data
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum