| Archive for johnlearsmoon.myfastforum.org a forum for parties interested in john lears upcoming book the living moon and the conspiracies surrounding a populated solar system |
| Lyrian |
Is it a rocket, Watchtower or am I seeing nothing!Hi guysLove to have your thoughts on this photo which I ripped off the NASA web site. What have we here? 
Click to see full size image bTW. I have enlarged this one so far that I am sure that I can see bunkers, will up that photo as well if wanted. 
|
||
| chaiyah |
After perusing Mars photos for the past week I get the impression that the occupants of that planet do not want to be seen.
I think they are hiding. That's my interpretation of the data. :shrug: Chai |
||
| Lyrian |
Here is a further blow up of the above photo.
Notice due south and north, maybe some sort of warehouse's? 
|
||
| chaiyah |
Okay. Here it is colorized.
It's made of metal. Its shape is that of a cannon or column, as you can see by the shape of its shadow, and it appear to have three life-figures walking near it. Near the top there is a hatch-door open. A ship. That's my interp. Chai BTW, do you have a source link for this photo? I like to name the file in accord with its origin. Thanx |
||
| Lyrian |
Got it off the JPL website... Nr. PIA09582
Can send you the large full size photo if needed. I was thinking myself more in the vain of some sort of Watchtower or some sort of Mining Tower. When you see the large photo of the area, you wonder why those "landslides" are all in the same frame of movement, they seem to me to be exactly the same in sense of lenght and width. Thanks for looking and thinking about it. |
||
| johnlear |
Re: Is it a rocket, Watchtower or am I seeing nothing!
My opinion is that all pictures you are shown alleged on Mars are really taken here on earth. Of course that is just my opinion. Who knows? Maybe they actually did send a spacecraft to land on Mars and it actually is sending back very narrow frames of the alleged surface. But I wouldn't put my money on it. 
|
||
| chaiyah |
Fellow Lyrian,
PIA09582 does not come up when I search for it. The other thing I notice, I'm having a hard time coming up with the dates any of these photos were taken. Please send me a copy of the whole bedsheet for 09582 at emicra8 at aol dot com. Thanks. John, why couldn't these photos have been taken from the Hubble? Emily |
||
| johnlear |
I imagine that there are fantastic photos of all the planets taken by the Hubbles. By the way there are 2 Hubbles. One is a secret military one and the other is the one the public knows about. Several years ago after the first, secret Hubble was launched the military was watching something in space, allegedly something coming towards us. When the public Hubble was launched they needed to use it for a stereoscopic view of the object. So they told the public that their Hubble was defective and had to be re-engineered. The company that did the re-engineering got paid for doing nothing because there was nothing wrong and the military got to use the second Hubble for their work while the re-engineering was going on that was really not going on. So everybody was happy, of course, except the public, who had to pay for the Hubble three time. Once for the secret Hubble, once for the public Hubble and once for the re-engineering of the public Hubble that really didn't have to be re-engineered. |
||
| chaiyah |
I get so tired of all the lies and secrecy ... as if we lived in a nation where "governance by consent" was respected; but we know, it isn't and we don't.
I'm talking to NASA, John, about the effects of re-coloring their dull grey photos. It'll take about a month for someone to get back to me on it. I keep all the results in my Blog top of my site, if you're interested. Best wishes, Emily |
||
| Lyrian |
Mr. Lear & Chaiyah
Here is the Webpage... http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/?IDNumber=PIA09582 I am very bad in Maths, could someone tell me what size that "Turret,Watchtower" is if you have the following ... "Range to target site: 253.2 km (158.3 miles) Original image scale range: 25.3 cm/pixel (with 1 x 1 binning) so objects ~76 cm across are resolved Map-projected scale: 25 cm/pixel and north is up" A lot to ask, but maybe it's as easy as falling off a tree for some. 
|
||
| chaiyah |
I've been over every inch of 9582. That is no satellite photo. It has a foreground path, intentional organized activity and depth of field.
Your original tower screenshot had to come from some other original because there's no "smooth surface" like this in 9582. MY problem is that camera see differently than the naked human eye. Ghosts and UFOs are present and visible to cameras that the human eye does not perceive. So, what I see is a multi-dimensional picture, in different scales. It's quite enough to scramble one's brains. Figure A shows two small figures that appear humanoid, on a completely different scale from-- Figure 2 showing a massive mechanical effort of a group of hominids that doesn't show up in the original, uncolored photo at all. So, frankly, I don't know what the hell I'm looking at. And for your edification, here is the whole photo, RE-colored, in its entirety. And maybe you can make sense out of it. But remember, where there's water, there's greenery. Also, this area is clearly a water-catching, water-storage area where human activity would be expected to occur. Here goes. 
|
||