Hirayama RadarLike Objects

Vril1 · Hirayama RadarLike Objects

Hello John. and evrybody. Smile

According to your topic regarding The case for civilisation on the moon.
It seems like the largest populated area is around Tsiolkovsky, with Lutke, Fermi, Delporte to the West - Perepelkin, Lane to the North - Patsaev, Lander to the East - and Waterman, Neujmin to the South.
Another of John Lears great founds is the Einthoven-Meitner-Pasteur-Area.
It seems like there´s a big mining-area, spaceport, citys and other great lonely structures around this area. And further towards West, northwest a great mining-area and citys and space-port facilitys with radar-like screens popping up a few places in the area around Hirayama all the way to Mare Smythii.
So conclusion for this great area on the backside of the moon must definetely be that from Mare Smythii and through Hirayama and Einthoven-Meitner-Pasteur and further through Langemak over Lutke, Fermi, Delporte and finally Tsiolkovsky. Is great citys, mining-facilitys, spaceports, harbours, lakes and other still undiscovered facilitys!
Here is a couple of images showing radar-like facilities and other exiting structures! In the Hirayama-area.

And the same area another photo.

And still another photo showing radar-Structure in upper-left corner:

Then finally to the left of this area is another very big crater-like possible radar-structure:

Think the most exiting is that it seems like from Mare Smythii and all the way to Tsiolkovsky is evidence showing structures and all kind of intelligent designs - So when will we hear a public statement from NASA/JPL - Wink

Mountain

Nice pictures Vril1. Interesting to see how the sunlight seem to reflect
on these domelike building structures.
Last but not least the qualitiy of these images is not good enough
for identify more objects or structures .
Picture 3 and 4 may show some engineered structures .

Vril1 · Pic

Hi Mountain. Smile

Yes you are absolutely right! The quality of the pictures should be far better! Especially when we know how they were made and in comparison to many other pictures released from NASA/JPL from the same missions! Smile

But then again - We only have the poor digital copys and must try to find the evidence in Quantity instead of in Quality! Smile

And I think allready now (From all research done by many people) there´s enough photographic evidence for something is happening on the moon we are not being told about! - What is your opinion on that?
best wishes.

Mountain

I think, the more people take some of their time to investigate , the more
interesting things we see....But is it really proof ? Thats the big deal...think
about how many people in the world have internet , and of those how
many are only shopping in the net, or doing something else, i recognized, e a lot more people are interested in the moon and mars thread than 3 years ago. We have to thank Hoagland, John Lear, Project Redstar, J.P
Skipper and some more individuums and projects. We are only at the
beginning of this new consciousness . Idea

Vril1

Hi again Mountain
Without John Lear, Hoagland, Adamskii, H.Menger, P.Hansen. And the whole UFO-cover up. We probably wouldn´t have this conversation!
Yes your right! How many is really interested! - Not many!, but maybe in the future And with help from the web! Smile

And proof, That’s exactly a viewpoint we must dig a little big in! Smile

Proof for you and me, don’t necessarily means the same as proof for somebody else!
I think the most digitally images from the moon are in such quality that we can only use them to show the “cover-ups” represented in them! - What I mean is that all the changes made by NASA/JPL in order to hide what´s really in the pictures! - That is possible for those people who are interested and lucky to have saved the first generation of digitally photographic prints, from the missions to the moon, published on the web!
Today some of the prints on the web are 3-generation prints with alterations like digitally-retouch, contrast-changes, color-changes etc. made several times within the same print! Even that JPL says that they are a new generation of pictures! They are only copys of the same pictures but with new and more effective alterations!
But when we know there´s several dusins of thousands digitally pictures from the Moon taken from Ranger, Lunar Orbiter, Apollo and Clemmentine! here on the web. - I really think there is many discoverys still to make for those who got the time and interest! Smile

And that’s obvious that for making a real professional research, you must have the original analog first generation pictures! The right knowledge! The right equipment! The right people! Time and time! Smile

Then again the internet is a funny “size” - you can build upon others research - and keep doing it, so maybe in the future somebody suddenly have all the right pieces in the right moment! And will be able to proof that we have been told a lie by the proper authorities! And the moon is a constructed space-vehicle and the surface have atmosphere and there´s water, and biology! Smile

chaiyah · Re: Hirayama RadarLike Objects

Vril1 · people-vision

Hello chaiyah,
Can see you have highlighted some features in the pictures.
The area in forefront of the last picture is about 20 km or more. So it has to be Giants you can see! Smile

And the pictures are so blurry that its even hard to recognize a building or a radar-facility (If it is that). Smile

But the amount of different structures in the area, are interesting! And if somebody can find pictures from other missions from the same area, and maybe in a better quality! That would be great! Smile

chaiyah

Human figures are the size that physicality permits. Human figures in history have ranged from 36ft Nephilim to 20" Pygmies, full grown.

http://www.stevequayle.com/Giants/charts/charts.html

I am going to make the claim, here and elsewhere, based on my experiences with NASA Mars and Moon photos, that they are clueless about scale.

Because NASA technicians have NO HANDLE on natural color; because they are UNABLE to recognize or identify living features, they constantly mess up and alter both vertical and horizontal scales, without being conscious of the effect they have on visibility of details.

NASA has no more idea how large something is than the man in the moon; and any claims to the contrary about size or distance-perspective is pure BS from my p-o-v now that I have closely examined several THOUSANDS of NASA Rover and Moon photos.

Shechaiyah

Vril1 · Giants !? on the moon

HI again.

HELP ME ! ..... somebody!! Smile

Mountain

Is it not amazing to see the anomalous structures in these pictures ? I do not say, that it is impossible to identify people in images, but truly not inside this quality of detail. To identify tiny people you need much more visible information, not being included here ....

chaiyah

All you need is pixelation for whoever shows up.

It's amazing to me how many people who class themselves as scientific insist that knowledge is impossible.

Shechaiyah

Vril1

Hi Chaiyah.

Still the area is about 10 km in the near horisontally view! How on earth are you keeping seing people in such physically sorroundings copied down to such miserable digitally reproductions? It´s still difficult to discover even a building or something else in great size!
I know you have had this conversation with many others about your pictures and scaling!
Im no expert but I do know that people cannot function in a size like you are showing them to be!

chaiyah

Hirayama RadarLike Objects

Pic

Re: Hirayama RadarLike Objects

people-vision

Giants !? on the moon