 |
|
 |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Matyas
Joined: 01 Jan 2007
Posts: 43
Location: out of my mind
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:48 am Post subject: The late great Heim |
|
|
This work deserves its own thread. I find it peculiar that his work parallels my own with the major difference being I am working with a rotating virtual electron field and Heim is acclerating the electrons themselves to relativistic speeds. 11 light years in 80 days might seem fanciful, but here we have a hard core theoretician offering us the knowledge on a silver platter.
I intend to expand on this too in due time.
_________________
The eagle, who believed he was a chicken, wasn't. However, until he discovered what he was, he was limited to live as one. -Walter Russell |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Lubomir
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 21
Location: Bulgaria, EU
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.hpcc-space.com/
unfortunately there is no progress since several months. Looks like someone don't want this research to move forward  They all concentrate on rockets, without thinking for the future  |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
johnlear
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lubomir wrote: | http://www.hpcc-space.com/
unfortunately there is no progress since several months. Looks like someone don't want this research to move forward They all concentrate on rockets, without thinking for the future |
I don't understand the mathematics here but the mere use of G indicates the formula is invalid.
G was proven in error by Pari Spolter in here 1993 book the Gravitational Force of the Sun where she shows that gravity is not the result of mass/density but the result of Keplers Third Law. Keplers Third Law mathematically stated is the force of gravity of a planet is equal to the acceleration (sidereal) times the area of a circle the radius of which is the mean distance betwen that planet and the sun.
This means that all planets is our solar system have generally the same gravity as earth including the moon.
The reason NASA seems to be concentrating on rockets is that is a cover for their real techonology.
You may have read or heard about NASA trying to reinvent the wheel or actually trying to recover the technology that was used in the Apollo program. They cannot recover it because it was never there. All we saw was a rocket take off (Saturn V) that had a lot of smoke and flames and allegedly took men to the moon.
Actually is was just smoke and mirrors. Apollo was faked. There is nothing to recover because there was nothing there in the first place, |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Lubomir
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 21
Location: Bulgaria, EU
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnlear wrote: |
I don't understand the mathematics here but the mere use of G indicates the formula is invalid.
G was proven in error by Pari Spolter in here 1993 book the Gravitational Force of the Sun where she shows that gravity is not the result of mass/density but the result of Keplers Third Law. Keplers Third Law mathematically stated is the force of gravity of a planet is equal to the acceleration (sidereal) times the area of a circle the radius of which is the mean distance betwen that planet and the sun.
This means that all planets is our solar system have generally the same gravity as earth including the moon. |
With other words they purposely look into wrong direction.
| johnlear wrote: | The reason NASA seems to be concentrating on rockets is that is a cover for their real techonology.
You may have read or heard about NASA trying to reinvent the wheel or actually trying to recover the technology that was used in the Apollo program. They cannot recover it because it was never there. All we saw was a rocket take off (Saturn V) that had a lot of smoke and flames and allegedly took men to the moon.
Actually is was just smoke and mirrors. Apollo was faked. There is nothing to recover because there was nothing there in the first place, |
Just like David Copperfield's tricks?
But it looks real 
And after 10 years they'll do it again?
The Soviet N1 program must have been the soviet cover up, right?
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
