 |
|
 |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
zorgon
Site Admin
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 84
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 11:36 pm Post subject: Aristarchus Crater - Glowing Blue Gem |
|
|
Aristarchus Crater
Aristarchus Crater has long been a much debated enigma on the Moon. Yet when ever you see pictures and try to get close in for details, the area is a total white out, with no detail. It is supposedly because of its brightness. We will discuss the rumors and stories of Aristarchus further down. The image above is taken from LO-001. As you can see the area is devoid of any gray pixels, leaving a totally white splotch. Below is the same area on LO-002. Again we see the totally white splotch. You will find this in all of the lesser quality full moon images on the web.
Aristarchus Crater Dec 17th 2005
The picture above is Aristarchus Crater clipped from an image taken with a 10" Telescope by Mike's Astro Imaging in the UK. The photo and our clips are copyrighted and all rights reserved. This image is used here by permission.
Compare this image to the high res image from the Clementine Satellite below and remember that this is a 10" telescope image. This fact is extremely important in the face of no high res images of the moon being found on the internet.
You will notice the symmetrical dome like structure of the "crater" as well as the bright blue glow that literally lights up the surrounding area!! The overall effect is that of plasma energy emitting from the dome, or at least very bright light. Even if one were to believe that this was reflected Earth light, it would still mean there was a bright reflective structure here.
Aristarchus Crater
Mike's Astro Imagery UK Rotated Left 90 degrees.
Both original Lick Observatory Photos are available in a Zip File Here
Mike's Astro Imagery Full Photo is available in a Zip File Here
_________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 - 1860) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
zorgon
Site Admin
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 84
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aristarchus Crater Clementine Image
Information about the source of the Clementine Color images has its own thread here at The Living Moon. You can get the summary of details at Pegasus Research Consortium - Aristarchus
The image above is cropped from the full spread Clementine image. Click on the image to see one cropped from the 65 meg version.
_________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 - 1860) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
zorgon
Site Admin
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 84
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 11:46 pm Post subject: Aristarchus Crater - Apollo 11 |
|
|
Aristarchus Crater
Apollo 11 Transcript from Mission log
Many people have argued that if any of these Moon Conspiracy theorys had any merit, why don't the Astronauts ever mention it? Well they do, despite the fact that they are held to a very strict and serious non disclosure agreement.
However, here is a clip from the official Apollo 11 mission log, specifically regarding Aristarchus Crater and the other glowing object...
_________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 - 1860) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
kungfu
Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
playing devils advocate, i have an issue with this whole fusion generator thing:
Why build it where we can see it? Why not put it on the other side?
Also, this is not so much an issue with it being a fusion generator, but since we have had reports of TLP (transient light phenom) on the moon from this region since at least 1100, then we know that human beings did not put it there. So if it isn't ours, then we can either assume some long forgotten species had a moon base and left the power on, or they are still up there watching us...
on the other side of the coin:
Why is it so difficult in 2008 to get high resolution/clear images of the moon?
One thing I find a little odd is that there are a lot of Rilles that show up in the middle of craters. Is this because the impacts puncture the crust and allow lava to escape. I read that most rilles on the moon are belived to be collapsed lava tubes. It seems odd that they seem to coincide with the direct center of impact craters to me. Also, in the middle of many craters there appear to be formations, are these the remnants of asteroids that hit or are they volcanos that form after impact?
What does seem also a little funny is that there are a ton of craters with mini craters right in the center of them. Almost like we have been drivign around on teh moon taking samples from all the various craters to try to find various elements...
One last thing I noticed that seemed funny was what appears to be superhighways that run between a few of the more major craters. It almost looks like what you would expect a dust pattern to look like if many trucks had been driven back and forth between them for years.
ok enough of my rambling wonderings...
PS: any chance you can go through your posts and relink the photos all I am seeing are red x's...thx |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
johnlear
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kungfu wrote: | playing devils advocate, i have an issue with this whole fusion generator thing:
Why build it where we can see it? Why not put it on the other side?
Also, this is not so much an issue with it being a fusion generator, but since we have had reports of TLP (transient light phenom) on the moon from this region since at least 1100, then we know that human beings did not put it there. So if it isn't ours, then we can either assume some long forgotten species had a moon base and left the power on, or they are still up there watching us...
on the other side of the coin: |
They are still there.
| Quote: | | Why is it so difficult in 2008 to get high resolution/clear images of the moon? |
NASA dosn't want us to see whats up there. Try visiting thelivingmoon.com for better photos.
| Quote: | One thing I find a little odd is that there are a lot of Rilles that show up in the middle of craters. Is this because the impacts puncture the crust and allow lava to escape. I read that most rilles on the moon are belived to be collapsed lava tubes. It seems odd that they seem to coincide with the direct center of impact craters to me. Also, in the middle of many craters there appear to be formations, are these the remnants of asteroids that hit or are they volcanos that form after impact?
What does seem also a little funny is that there are a ton of craters with mini craters right in the center of them. Almost like we have been drivign around on teh moon taking samples from all the various craters to try to find various elements...
One last thing I noticed that seemed funny was what appears to be superhighways that run between a few of the more major craters. It almost looks like what you would expect a dust pattern to look like if many trucks had been driven back and forth between them for years. |
Please visit Allan Sturns lunomaly.com for some real photo of the moon.
| Quote: | ok enough of my rambling wonderings...
PS: any chance you can go through your posts and relink the photos all I am seeing are red x's...thx |
Probably not, but they are all on thelivingmoon.com. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
kungfu
Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"they are still there"
but this still doesn't answer the question of why build it where we can see it?
they put the moon in our orbit, they locked the rotation so we would always be able to see it
do you think the purpose was to tease us to wonder 'what the heck is that glowing thing?' and thus drive us to want to escape the earth.
I am starting to believe that life = WILL, and that if you have enough WILL to do something, it will happen, perhaps these kind of teasers are how they drive us to evolve as a species? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
johnlear
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kungfu wrote: | "they are still there"
but this still doesn't answer the question of why build it where we can see it? |
They didn't build it where we could see it. They built it somewhere else and towed it here.
| Quote: | they put the moon in our orbit, they locked the rotation so we would always be able to see it
|
No. They locked the rotation so that we could not see the far side.
| Quote: | | do you think the purpose was to tease us to wonder 'what the heck is that glowing thing?' and thus drive us to want to escape the earth. |
I think the purpose of the moon was a temporary home from which those in charge could monitor our quarantine to be sure we didn't get out and to help us mature to a point where we could visit other planets and become of uselful part of the universe.
| Quote: | | I am starting to believe that life = WILL, and that if you have enough WILL to do something, it will happen, perhaps these kind of teasers are how they drive us to evolve as a species? |
Unlikely. Our purpose on earth is to mature our souls and we do that by trying to live without envy, hate or greed. That is all we are here for. We are not a 'species' which is evolving. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
kungfu
Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
let me rephrase to be more specific:
why put the fusion generator in a place that we can so easily see it (front side of moon), why not put that on the backside of the moon with the rest of the hidden stuff
it would make more sense to me to hide the fusion generator with everything else on the dark side
it just seems like a bad idea to put a big night light on if you want to keep everyone in the dark
i wonder if it is not a fusion generator but rather some kind of monitoring device that is picking up brain waves/radio signals/internet/etc, and THAT is why they would put such an obvious beacon on our visible side of the moon.
Does that make more sense? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
johnlear
Joined: 31 Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kungfu wrote: | let me rephrase to be more specific:
i wonder if it is not a fusion generator but rather some kind of monitoring device that is picking up brain waves/radio signals/internet/etc, and THAT is why they would put such an obvious beacon on our visible side of the moon.
Does that make more sense? |
The antenna for that beacon is dead center of the moon in the Sinus Medii.
Here is a photo taken by Lunar Orbiter 3. The negative number is 84M. The antenna stand about 6 miles high pointing directly at earth. The huge bulbous looking object on top is actually a gigantic cube which measures approximately 1 mile on each side. Probably data storage.
I think they put the generator on this side because it was so noisy and people couldn't get any sleep on the far side. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Down Syndrome Adonis
Joined: 10 Aug 2008
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Zorgon, all your links come-up 404 Not Found. Is it possible to update the information or is it now unavailable?
Thanks and regards, DSA
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
